Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27719761›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Asymmetric effects of activating and inactivating cortical interneurons.

Elizabeth Ak Phillips, Andrea R Hasenstaub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Type-I nNOS neurons orchestrate cortical neural activity and vasomotion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Reciprocal interaction between cortical SST and PV interneurons in top-down regulation of retinothalamic refinement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Distinct Inhibitory Neurons Differently Shape Neuronal Codes for Sound Intensity in the Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Cell-type-specific enhancement of deviance detection by synaptic zinc in the mouse auditory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Sst- and Vip-Cre mouse lines without age-related hearing loss.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth Ak PhillipsNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Andrea R HasenstaubNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-5073

Funding

Dynamic regulation of auditory context processing by cortical inhibitionR01DC014101 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HASENSTAUB, ANDREA RAYNE · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bidirectional manipulations - activation and inactivation - are widely used to identify the functions supported by specific cortical interneuron types. Implicit in much of this work is the notion that tonic activation and inactivation will both produce valid, internally consistent insights into interneurons' computational roles. Here, using single-unit recordings in auditory cortex of awake mice, we show that this may not generally hold true. Optogenetically manipulating somatostatin-positive (Sst+) or parvalbumin-positive (Pvalb+) interneurons while recording tone-responses showed that Sst+ inactivation increased response gain, while Pvalb+ inactivation weakened tuning and decreased information transfer, implying that these neurons support delineable computational functions. But activating Sst+ and Pvalb+ interneurons revealed no such differences. We used a simple network model to understand this asymmetry, and showed how relatively small changes in key parameters, such as spontaneous activity or strength of the light manipulation, determined whether activation and inactivation would produce consistent or paradoxical conclusions regarding interneurons' computational functions.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAuditory CortexInterneuronsMiceModels, NeurologicalOptogeneticsParvalbuminsSomatostatinParvalbuminsSomatostatincortexinterneuronsmouseneuroscienceoptogenetics

Identifiers

PMID27719761
PMCPMC5123863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.