Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27718176›Full record

Trial reportObesity surgery2017

LSG vs OAGB-1 Year Follow-up Data-a Randomized Control Trial.

Shivakumar Seetharamaiah, Om Tantia, Ghanshyam Goyal, Tamonas Chaudhuri, Shashi Khanna, Jagat Pal Singh, Anmol Ahuja

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shivakumar SeetharamaiahDepartment of Minimal Access & Bariatric Surgery ILS Hospitals, DD-6, Sector 1, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700064, India.
Om TantiaDepartment of Minimal Access & Bariatric Surgery ILS Hospitals, DD-6, Sector 1, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700064, India. omtantia@gmail.com.
Ghanshyam GoyalDepartment of Minimal Access & Bariatric Surgery ILS Hospitals, DD-6, Sector 1, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700064, India.
Tamonas ChaudhuriDepartment of Minimal Access & Bariatric Surgery ILS Hospitals, DD-6, Sector 1, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700064, India.
Shashi KhannaDepartment of Minimal Access & Bariatric Surgery ILS Hospitals, DD-6, Sector 1, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700064, India.
Jagat Pal SinghDepartment of Minimal Access & Bariatric Surgery ILS Hospitals, DD-6, Sector 1, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700064, India.
Anmol AhujaDepartment of Minimal Access & Bariatric Surgery ILS Hospitals, DD-6, Sector 1, Salt Lake City, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700064, India.
Fortis Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most popular bariatric procedure. One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is rapidly emerging as a safe and effective metabolic procedure. This study aims at comparing the 1-year follow-up results of OAGB and LSG in terms of excess weight loss, complications, resolution of comorbidities, and quality of life.

methodsA prospective randomized study of results between 100 LSG and 101 OAGB patients was done from 2012 to 2015. The results were compared regarding operative outcomes, percentage of excess weight loss, complications, resolution of comorbidities, and quality of life (BAROS score).

resultsThe mean BMI for the OAGB and LSG group was 44.31 and 43.75 kg/m

conclusionsIn our study, there was no significant difference between LSG and OAGB in outcome at 1 year follow-up in % excess weight loss, remission of HTN, and quality of life. OAGB has marginally better outcome in T2 DM remission. However, a longer follow-up is required to establish a correct comparative result.

Indexed as

GastrectomyGastric BypassWeight LossAdultComorbidityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeBariatric Analysis Reporting and Outcome System (BAROS)Excess weight loss (EWL)Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD)Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB)

Identifiers

PMID27718176
OpenAlexW2529175695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.