Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27718160›Full record

ReviewMycopathologia2017

Reappraisal of Conventional Diagnosis for Dermatophytes.

Marc Pihet, Yohann Le Govic

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mycopathologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Comparison of Fungal Culture, DermaGeniusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Trichoscopy Unmasking Tinea Capitis in Elderly Individuals.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Pathogenesis, Immunology and Management of Dermatophytosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. An Outbreak ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Epidemiology and Diagnostic Perspectives of Dermatophytoses.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc PihetLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Institut de Biologie en Santé, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France. mapihet@chu-angers.fr.
Yohann Le GovicLaboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Institut de Biologie en Santé, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dermatophytoses include a wide variety of diseases involving glabrous skin, nails and hair. These superficial infections are a common cause of consultation in dermatology. In many cases, their diagnosis is not clinically obvious, and mycological analysis therefore is required. Direct microscopic examination of the samples using clearing agents provides a quick response to the clinician and is usually combined with cultures on specific media, which must be used to overcome the growth of contaminating moulds that may hamper the recovery of dermatophytes. Accurate identification of the causative agent (i.e. at the species level), currently based on morphological criteria, is necessary not only to initiate an appropriate treatment but also for setting prophylactic measures. However, conventional methods often lack sensitivity and species identification may require up to 4 weeks if subcultures are needed. Histological analysis, which is considered the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of onychomycoses, is seldom performed, and as direct examination, it does not allow precise identification of the pathogen. Nevertheless, a particular attention to the quality of clinical specimens is warranted. Moreover, the sensitivity of direct examination may be greatly enhanced by the use of fluorochromes such as calcofluor white. Likewise, sensitivity of the cultures could be enhanced by the use of culture media containing antifungal deactivators. With the generalization of molecular identification by gene sequencing or MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, the contribution of historical biochemical or physiological tests to species identification of atypical isolates is now limited. Nevertheless, despite the recent availability of several PCR-based kits and an extensive literature on molecular methods allowing the detection of fungal DNA or both detection and direct identification of the main dermatophyte species, the biological diagnosis of dermatophytosis in 2016 still relies on both direct examination and cultures of appropriate clinical specimens.

Indexed as

ArthrodermataceaeDermatomycosesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansMicrobiological TechniquesMicroscopyMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationDermatophytesDermatophytosisDirect examinationMycological analysisSpecific culture media

Identifiers

PMID27718160
OpenAlexW2528099745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.