Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27718134›Full record

ReviewGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2017

Postgastrectomy follow-up in the West: evidence base, guidelines, and daily practice.

Magnus Nilsson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Evaluation of post-operative surveillance strategies for esophageal and gastric cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Oral vitamin B₁₂ after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: mapping the evidence.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Total versus subtotal gastrectomy following neoadjuvant flot chemotherapy for distal diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma: an international cohort study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Endoscopic Diagnosis of Remnant Gastric Cancer After Gastrectomy.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Whether preferences of gastric cancer patients after surgery for follow-up change over time? Analysis based on discrete choice experiment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  11. International Delphi consensus guidelines for follow-up after prophylactic total gastrectomy: the Life after Prophylactic Total Gastrectomy (LAP-TG) study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Article
  12. Preferences of gastric cancer survivors for follow-up care-a multicenter discrete choice experiment study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Development of a predictive model for extragastric recurrence after curative resection for early gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Magnus NilssonDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Kirurggatan 53, 141 86, Stockholm, Sweden. magnus.nilsson@ki.se.
Karolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Follow-up after gastrectomy for gastric cancer has several purposes, including management of side effects of surgery, oncological recurrence surveillance, psychological support, and data collection for research. How follow-up after gastrectomy, and especially recurrence surveillance, is performed differs immensely between different Western countries, despite guidelines from Western oncological organizations quite unanimously advocating symptom-driven surveillance, without scheduled cross-sectional imaging, endoscopies, or analysis of tumor markers. Given a complete lack of randomized data, the available body of observational data does not support intensive routine surveillance for recurrent disease. Moreover, studies of other cancers have shown a negative emotional impact of routine surveillance. There is an apparent need for randomized controlled trials to address the issue of optimized strategies for postgastrectomy recurrence surveillance.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineGastrectomyEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFollow-Up StudiesHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Stomach NeoplasmsFollow-upGastrectomyGastric cancerRecurrence surveillance

Identifiers

PMID27718134
PMCPMC5316395
OpenAlexW2528401113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.