Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27718099›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2019

Bayesian Modelling of Induced Responses and Neuronal Rhythms.

Dimitris A Pinotsis, Roman Loonis, Andre M Bastos, Earl K Miller, Karl J Friston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Testing quantum-like markers in neural dynamics.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Categorization is 'baked' into the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Working Memory Load Modulates Neuronal Coupling.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dimitris A PinotsisThe Picower Institute for Learning & Memory and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. pinotsis@mit.edu.
Roman LoonisThe Picower Institute for Learning & Memory and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Andre M BastosThe Picower Institute for Learning & Memory and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Earl K MillerThe Picower Institute for Learning & Memory and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Karl J FristonThe Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.

Funding

Cortical Circuits for Attention and DecisionsR37MH087027 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MILLER, EARL K · 2010 to 2019
$4.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH087027Wellcome Trust 088130/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural rhythms or oscillations are ubiquitous in neuroimaging data. These spectral responses have been linked to several cognitive processes; including working memory, attention, perceptual binding and neuronal coordination. In this paper, we show how Bayesian methods can be used to finesse the ill-posed problem of reconstructing-and explaining-oscillatory responses. We offer an overview of recent developments in this field, focusing on (i) the use of MEG data and Empirical Bayes to build hierarchical models for group analyses-and the identification of important sources of inter-subject variability and (ii) the construction of novel dynamic causal models of intralaminar recordings to explain layer-specific activity. We hope to show that electrophysiological measurements contain much more spatial information than is often thought: on the one hand, the dynamic causal modelling of non-invasive (low spatial resolution) electrophysiology can afford sub-millimetre (hyper-acute) resolution that is limited only by the (spatial) complexity of the underlying (dynamic causal) forward model. On the other hand, invasive microelectrode recordings (that penetrate different cortical layers) can reveal laminar-specific responses and elucidate hierarchical message passing and information processing within and between cortical regions at a macroscopic scale. In short, the careful and biophysically grounded modelling of sparse data enables one to characterise the neuronal architectures generating oscillations in a remarkable detail.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremAttentionCognitionHumansMicroelectrodesModels, NeurologicalNeuronsCompartmental modelsConnectivityDynamic causal modellingHierarchical Bayesian modelsIntersubject variabilityLaminar responsesMicroelectrodes

Identifiers

PMID27718099
PMCPMC6592965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.