Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27718079›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2017

Breast dose reduction for chest CT by modifying the scanning parameters based on the pre-scan size-specific dose estimate (SSDE).

Masafumi Kidoh, Daisuke Utsunomiya, Seitaro Oda, Takeshi Nakaura, Yoshinori Funama, Hideaki Yuki, Kenichiro Hirata, Tomohiro Namimoto, Daisuke Sakabe, Masahiro Hatemura and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Masafumi KidohDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan. masafkidoh@yahoo.co.jp.
Daisuke UtsunomiyaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Seitaro OdaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Takeshi NakauraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Yoshinori FunamaDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Hideaki YukiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Kenichiro HirataDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Tomohiro NamimotoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Daisuke SakabeDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Masahiro HatemuraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Yasuyuki YamashitaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjo, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the usefulness of modifying scanning parameters based on the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) for a breast-dose reduction for chest CT. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe scanned 26 women with a fixed volume CT dose index (CTDI

resultsThe mean breast dose was about 35 % lower under protocol 2 than protocol 1 (10.9 mGy vs. 16.8 mGy, p < 0.01). The inter-patient breast dose variability was significantly lower under protocol 2 than 1 (1.2 mGy vs. 2.5 mGy, p < 0.01). We observed a moderate negative correlation between the breast dose and the BMI under protocol 1 (r = 0.43, p < 0.01); there was no significant correlation (r = 0.06, p = 0.35) under protocol 2.

conclusionThe SSDE-based protocol achieved a reduction in breast dose and in inter-patient breast dose variability. KEY POINTS: • CT scan parameters can be modified based on the pre-scan SSDE. • The pre-scan SSDE is useful for a breast dose reduction. • The fixed SSDE protocol reduced individual variations in the breast dose.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexBreastFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiation DosageRadiography, ThoracicRadionuclide ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedBreast radiation doseChest CTCTDIvolMOSFETSSDE

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.