Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27718037›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2017

Finite-Element Modelling of the Acoustic Input Admittance of the Newborn Ear Canal and Middle Ear.

Hamid Motallebzadeh, Nima Maftoon, Jacob Pitaro, W Robert J Funnell, Sam J Daniel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. How the Human Cochlea Moves: Biomechanical Modeling of a Wide, Layered Osseous Spiral Lamina.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  4. Acoustical Effects of Tympanostomy Tube Attachment to Human Tympanic Membrane.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mouse middle-ear forward and reverse acoustics.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Mechanical Properties of Baboon Tympanic Membrane from Young to Adult.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020
    Article
  11. A lumped-element model of the chinchilla middle ear.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Cochlear amplification and tuning depend on the cellular arrangement within the organ of Corti.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Attenuating the ear canal feedback pressure of a laser-driven hearing aid.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017
    Article
  15. Finite-Element Modelling of the Acoustic Input Admittance of the Newborn Ear Canal and Middle Ear.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hamid MotallebzadehDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, 3775 rue University, Montréal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.
Nima MaftoonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, 3775 rue University, Montréal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.
Jacob PitaroDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montréal Children's Hospital, Montréal, Canada.
W Robert J FunnellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, 3775 rue University, Montréal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada. robert.funnell@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7145-4590
Sam J DanielDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
McGill University · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Admittance measurement is a promising tool for evaluating the status of the middle ear in newborns. However, the newborn ear is anatomically very different from the adult one, and the acoustic input admittance is different than in adults. To aid in understanding the differences, a finite-element model of the newborn ear canal and middle ear was developed and its behaviour was studied for frequencies up to 2000 Hz. Material properties were taken from previous measurements and estimates. The simulation results were within the range of clinical admittance measurements made in newborns. Sensitivity analyses of the material properties show that in the canal model, the maximum admittance and the frequency at which that maximum admittance occurs are affected mainly by the stiffness parameter; in the middle-ear model, the damping is as important as the stiffness in influencing the maximum admittance magnitude but its effect on the corresponding frequency is negligible. Scaling up the geometries increases the admittance magnitude and shifts the resonances to lower frequencies. The results suggest that admittance measurements can provide more information about the condition of the middle ear when made at multiple frequencies around its resonance.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationFinite Element AnalysisEar CanalEar, MiddleHumansInfant, NewbornVibrationadmittanceclinical measurementsexternal ear canalfinite-element modelfrequency responseinfantslinear material propertiesmiddle earnewbornssensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID27718037
PMCPMC5243259
OpenAlexW2528008435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.