ArticleExperimental brain research2017
Simultaneous assessment of hand function and neuromuscular quickness through a static object manipulation task in healthy adults.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The rate of force development scaling factor: a review of underlying factors, assessment methods and potential for practical applications.European journal of applied physiology · 2022Review
- A novel method to assess rate of force relaxation: reliability and comparisons with rate of force development across various muscles.European journal of applied physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both hand function [as seen through the coordination between grip force (GF) and load force (LF)] and the ability to produce a submaximal force quickly (i.e., neuromuscular quickness) are two important qualities of motor function that could be seriously affected by the presence of neurological diseases. Therefore, their quantitative assessment is very important in clinical settings. Within this study, we aimed to develop, standardize, and measure the within-session reliability of a clinically meaningful test that assesses both hand function and neuromuscular quickness simultaneously. Thirteen healthy young adults produced around 90 rapid isometric LF pulses to varying submaximal magnitudes by either pulling down or pulling up on an externally fixed GF- and LF-measuring device. Results revealed high indices of force coordination (i.e., GF scaling as assessed by GF/LF and GF coupling as assessed by maximum cross-correlation between GF and LF) in both force directions, while GF coupling was higher in downward than in upward direction (p < 0.001). Regarding the indices of neuromuscular quickness (i.e., the regression parameters obtained from the relationship between peak force and it's rate of development and half-relaxation time), results, in general, revealed a higher slope (named as rate of force development scaling factor; p < 0.01), similar R
Indexed as
Identifiers
27717994What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.