Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27717393›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2016

Effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to enhance implementation of a healthy canteen policy in Australian primary schools: a randomised controlled trial.

Nicole Nathan, Sze Lin Yoong, Rachel Sutherland, Kathryn Reilly, Tessa Delaney, Lisa Janssen, Katie Robertson, Renee Reynolds, Li Kheng Chai, Christophe Lecathelinais and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Global parent perspectives on school food service internationally: A mixed papers narrative review.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Measurement Methods Used to Assess the School Food Environment: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. PolicyPublic health nutrition · 2025
    Article
  20. Characterisation of At-Scale Community Health Interventions Aimed to Improve Healthy Eating Behaviour in Australia: A Rapid Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicole NathanHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2287, Australia. Nicole.Nathan@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au.
Sze Lin YoongHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.
Rachel SutherlandHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.
Kathryn ReillyHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.
Tessa DelaneyHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.
Lisa JanssenHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.
Katie RobertsonHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.
Renee ReynoldsHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.
Li Kheng ChaiHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.
Christophe LecathelinaisHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.
John WiggersHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.
Luke WolfendenHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe implementation of school nutrition policies, which govern the provision of food in schools, is recommended as a public health strategy to support the development of healthy dietary behaviours in school-aged children. Despite this, research internationally and in Australia indicates that few schools implement such policies. This study aims to examine whether a theoretically designed, multi-strategy intervention was effective in increasing the implementation of a healthy canteen policy in Australian primary schools.

methodsA parallel group randomised controlled trial was conducted with all government and Catholic primary schools within one region in New South Wales, Australia who had an operational canteen that provided food to primary school aged children (5-12 years) and were not currently receiving an intervention to change their canteen practices. Schools randomised to the intervention arm received a 9-month multicomponent intervention including ongoing support, provision of resources, performance monitoring and feedback, executive support and recognition. The primary outcomes were the proportion of the schools with a canteen menu that: i) did not include 'red' or 'banned' items according to the healthy canteen policy; and ii) had more than 50 % 'green' items. The primary outcome was assessed via menu audit at baseline and follow up by dietitians blinded to group allocation.

resultsFifty-three eligible schools were randomised to either the intervention or control group (28 intervention; 25 control). Analyses with 51 schools who returned school menus found that intervention schools were significantly more likely relative to control schools to have a menu without 'red' or 'banned' items (RR = 5.78 (1.45-23.05); p = 0.002) and have at least 50 % of menu items classified as green (RR = 2.03 (1.01-4.08); p = 0.03).

conclusionsThis study found that a multi-component intervention was effective in improving primary schools' compliance with a healthy canteen policy. Given the lack of evidence regarding how best to support schools with implementing evidence-based policies to improve child diet, this trial for the first time provides high quality evidence to practitioners and policy makers seeking to improve nutrition policy implementation in schools.

trial registrationThis trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12614001148662 ) 30th October 2014.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorNutrition PolicySchool Health ServicesSchoolsAustraliaChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolFemaleFoodFood ServicesHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansMaleCanteenImplementationNutritionPolicySchools

Identifiers

PMID27717393
PMCPMC5054617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.