ArticleHarm reduction journal2016
Meaningful engagement of people living with HIV who use drugs: methodology for the design of a Peer Research Associate (PRA) hiring model.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing Veteran-Facing Materials for Vending Machine-Dispensed HIV Self-Testing: Formative Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- The public health impacts of drug-induced homicide laws: a community-engaged scoping review.Health & justice · 2026Article
- Consensus Building on Strategies That Address Medical Mistrust to Better Engage Priority Populations in HIV Cure Research.Behavioral medicine (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Use of Vending Machines to Deliver Oral Rapid HIV Self-Tests to Veterans: Protocol for a Pilot Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Co-Designing the PATH Harm Reduction Training for the Peer Workforce: A Community-Based Participatory Approach.Research square · 2025Article
- A case against purity: prioritizing translational polysubstance use research.Current opinion in psychiatry · 2025Review
- Physical and psychosocial impact on peers with HIV co-leading an HIV intervention: A pilot theory-guided case-study.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Doing community-based research during dual public health emergencies (COVID and overdose).Harm reduction journal · 2023Article
- An evaluation of the Compassion, Inclusion, and Engagement initiative: learning from PWLE and communities across British Columbia.Harm reduction journal · 2023Article
- 'Progression capitals': How homeless health peer advocacy impacts peer advocates.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2022Article
- Organizational support for frontline harm reduction and systems navigation work among workers with living and lived experience: qualitative findings from British Columbia, Canada.Harm reduction journal · 2021Article
- Cohort profile: the STOP HIV/AIDS Program Evaluation (SHAPE) study in British Columbia, Canada.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Hiring, training, and supporting Peer Research Associates: Operationalizing community-based research principles within epidemiological studies by, with, and for women living with HIV.Harm reduction journal · 2019Article
- Achieving meaningful participation of people who use drugs and their peer organizations in a strategic research partnership.Harm reduction journal · 2019Article
- Activism and scientific research: 20 years of community action by the Vancouver area network of drug users.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-based HIV, harm reduction, and addiction research increasingly involve members of affected communities as Peer Research Associates (PRAs)-individuals with common experiences to the participant population (e.g. people who use drugs, people living with HIV [PLHIV]). However, there is a paucity of literature detailing the operationalization of PRA hiring and thus limited understanding regarding how affected communities can be meaningfully involved through low-barrier engagement in paid positions within community-based participatory research (CBPR) projects. We aim to address this gap by describing a low-threshold PRA hiring process.
resultsIn 2012, the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS and the Dr. Peter AIDS Foundation collaborated to develop a mixed-method CBPR project evaluating the effectiveness of the Dr. Peter Centre (DPC)-an integrative HIV care facility in Vancouver, Canada. A primary objective of the study was to assess the impact of DPC services among clients who have a history of illicit drug use. In keeping with CBPR principles, affected populations, community-based organizations, and key stakeholders guided the development and dissemination of a low-barrier PRA hiring process to meaningfully engage affected communities (e.g. PLHIV who have a history of illicit drug use) in all aspects of the research project. The hiring model was implemented in a number of stages, including (1) the establishment of a hiring team; (2) the development and dissemination of the job posting; (3) interviewing applicants; and (4) the selection of participants. The hiring model presented in this paper demonstrates the benefits of hiring vulnerable PLHIV who use drugs as PRAs in community-based research.
conclusionsThe provision of low-barrier access to meaningful research employment described herein attempts to engage affected communities beyond tokenistic involvement in research. Our hiring model was successful at engaging five PRAs over a 2-year period and fostered opportunities for future paid employment or volunteer opportunities through ongoing collaboration between PRAs and a diverse range of stakeholders working in HIV/AIDS and addictions. Additionally, this model has the potential to be used across a range of studies and community-based settings interested in meaningfully engaging communities in all stages of the research process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.