Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27717169›Full record

ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2017

5HT

D A Amodeo, E Rivera, E H Cook, J A Sweeney, M E Ragozzino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Behavioral Assessment of Tramadol and Meloxicam Effects on Postoperative Pain in a Rat Craniotomy Model.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Partial MACS chemical neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Altered Serotonin 2A (5-HTFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D A AmodeoDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago.
E RiveraDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago.
E H CookInstitute of Juvenile Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
J A SweeneyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
M E RagozzinoDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago.
University of Illinois Chicago · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

TRANS STUDIES OF COGNITIVE,AFFECTIVE/NEUROCHEMICAL PROCESSES UNDERLYING INSISTENCP50HD055751 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI GIBBONS, ROBERT D · 2007 to 2011
$9.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD055751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restricted and repetitive behaviors are a defining feature of autism, which can be expressed as a cognitive flexibility deficit or stereotyped, motor behaviors. There is limited knowledge about the underlying neuropathophysiology contributing to these behaviors. Previous findings suggest that central 5HT

Indexed as

AnimalsAutism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderCognition DisordersCorpus StriatumDisease Models, AnimalExploratory BehaviorFluorobenzenesGroomingMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsNeostriatumPiperidinesPrefrontal CortexReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2AFluorobenzenesPiperidinesReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2ASerotonin 5-HT2 Receptor AntagonistsvolinanserinAutismcaudategroomingM100907orbitofrontal cortexreversal learning

Identifiers

PMID27717169
PMCPMC5334373
OpenAlexW2527388212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.