Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716506›Full record

ReviewCell2016

Field Guide to Plant Model Systems.

Caren Chang, John L Bowman, Elliot M Meyerowitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Journal of advanced research · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caren ChangDepartment of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-5815, USA. Electronic address: carenc@umd.edu.
John L BowmanSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia. Electronic address: john.bowman@monash.edu.
Elliot M MeyerowitzHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. Electronic address: meyerow@caltech.edu.

Funding

Feedback between multiple signaling modes in control of a plant stem cell nicheR01GM104244 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MEYEROWITZ, ELLIOT M · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the past several decades, advances in plant development, physiology, cell biology, and genetics have relied heavily on the model (or reference) plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Arabidopsis resembles other plants, including crop plants, in many but by no means all respects. Study of Arabidopsis alone provides little information on the evolutionary history of plants, evolutionary differences between species, plants that survive in different environments, or plants that access nutrients and photosynthesize differently. Empowered by the availability of large-scale sequencing and new technologies for investigating gene function, many new plant models are being proposed and studied.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPlantsArabidopsisBiodiversityBiological EvolutionChlorophytaPlant Development

Identifiers

PMID27716506
PMCPMC5068971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.