Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716494›Full record

ArticleAccident; analysis and prevention2017

Mechanisms behind distracted driving behavior: The role of age and executive function in the engagement of distracted driving.

Caitlin Northcutt Pope, Tyler Reed Bell, Despina Stavrinos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accident; analysis and prevention, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Simulated driving behavior over the adult age span.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Predicting Errors, Violations, and Safety Participation Behavior at Nuclear Power Plants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Executive function and dangerous driving behaviors in young drivers.Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour · 2018
    Article
  17. Executive Function Capacities, Negative Driving Behavior and Crashes in Young Drivers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caitlin Northcutt PopeThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, UAB Department of Psychology, CH 415, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-1170, United States.
Tyler Reed BellThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, UAB Department of Psychology, CH 415, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-1170, United States.
Despina StavrinosThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, UAB Department of Psychology, CH 415, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-1170, United States. Electronic address: dstavrin@uab.edu.

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG022838 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BALL, KARLENE K · 2003 to 2020
$5.7M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performing secondary tasks, such as texting while driving, is associated with an increased risk of motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). While cognitive processes, such as executive function, are involved in driving, little is known about the relationship between executive control and willingness to engage in distracted driving. This study investigated the relationship between age, behavioral manifestations of executive function, and self-reported distracted driving behaviors. Executive difficulty (assessed with the BRIEF-A) as well as demographics (age and gender) was considered as possible predictors of engagement in distracted driving behaviors. Fifty-nine young, middle, and older adults self-reported executive difficulty and weekly engagement in distracted driving behaviors. Results revealed that while partially accounted for by age, global executive difficulty was uniquely related to engagement in distracted driving behaviors. Older age was associated with fewer weekly self-reported distracted driving behaviors while higher self-reported executive difficulty was associated with more frequent weekly engagement in distracted behavior. No significant differences were found between young and middle-aged adults on distracted driving behaviors. Findings conclude that distracted driving is a ubiquitous phenomenon evident in drivers of all ages. Possible mechanisms underlying distracted driving behavior could potentially be related to deficits in executive function.

Indexed as

Dangerous BehaviorRisk-TakingAccidents, TrafficAdultAgedAge FactorsAutomobile DrivingDistracted DrivingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceSelf ReportYoung AdultAdolescent driversDistracted drivingExecutive functionOlder drivers

Identifiers

PMID27716494
PMCPMC5167635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.