Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716415›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2016

An evidence synthesis of the international knowledge base for new care models to inform and mobilise knowledge for multispecialty community providers (MCPs).

Alison Turner, Abeda Mulla, Andrew Booth, Shiona Aldridge, Sharon Stevens, Fraser Battye, Peter Spilsbury

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The impact of new forms of large-scale general practice provider collaborations on England's NHS: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. (Dis)Integrated Care? Lessons from East London.International journal of integrated care · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alison TurnerStrategy Unit, Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK. alison.turner14@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0003-3075-0868
Abeda MullaStrategy Unit, Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK.
Andrew BoothSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Shiona AldridgeStrategy Unit, Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK.
Sharon StevensStrategy Unit, Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK.
Fraser BattyeStrategy Unit, Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK.
Peter SpilsburyStrategy Unit, Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/15/77/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNHS England's Five Year Forward View (NHS England, Five Year Forward View, 2014) formally introduced a strategy for new models of care driven by simultaneous pressures to contain costs, improve care and deliver services closer to home through integrated models. This synthesis focuses on a multispecialty community provider (MCP) model. This new model of care seeks to overcome the limitations in current models of care, often based around single condition-focused pathways, in contrast to patient-focused delivery (Royal College of General Practitioners, The 2022 GP: compendium of evidence, 2012) which offers greater continuity of care in recognition of complex needs and multimorbidity.

methodsThe synthesis, an innovative combination of best fit framework synthesis and realist synthesis, will develop a "blueprint" which articulates how and why MCP models work, to inform design of future iterations of the MCP model. A systematic search will be conducted to identify research and practice-derived evidence to achieve a balance that captures the historical legacy of MCP models but focuses on contemporary evidence. Sources will include bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, PreMEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, HMIC and Cochrane Library; and grey literature sources. The Best Fit synthesis methodology will be combined with a synthesis following realist principles which are particularly suited to exploring what works, when, for whom and in what circumstances. DISCUSSION: The aim of this synthesis is to provide decision makers in health and social care with a practical evidence base relating to the multispecialty community provider (MCP) model of care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016039552 .

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesKnowledge BasesMedicineState MedicineCommunity NetworksCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandEvidence-Based MedicineHumansCommunity health servicesInnovation, organizationalIntegrated health carePrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID27716415
PMCPMC5045634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.