Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716389›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

Recurrent patent infections with Toxocara canis in household dogs older than six months: a prospective study.

Rolf Nijsse, Lapo Mughini-Gras, Jaap A Wagenaar, Harm W Ploeger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Helminth Fauna in Captive European Gray Wolves (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rolf NijsseDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, P.O. box 80.165, 3508, TD, Utrecht, The Netherlands. e.r.nijsse@uu.nl.
Lapo Mughini-GrasDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, P.O. box 80.165, 3508, TD, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jaap A WagenaarDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, P.O. box 80.165, 3508, TD, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Harm W PloegerDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, P.O. box 80.165, 3508, TD, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo reduce environmental contamination with Toxocara canis eggs, the current general advice is to deworm all dogs older than six months on average four times a year. However, only a small proportion of non-juvenile household dogs actually shed T. canis eggs, and some dogs shed eggs more frequently than others. The identification of these frequent shedders and the associated risk factors is an important cornerstone for constructing evidence-based deworming regimens. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors associated with recurrence of periods of shedding Toxocara eggs in a cohort of household dogs older than six months.

methodsWe performed a prospective study (July 2011 to October 2014) on shedding Toxocara eggs in a cohort of 938 household dogs older than six months from all over the Netherlands. The median follow-up time was 14 months. Monthly, owners sent faecal samples of their dogs for Toxocara testing and completed a questionnaire. Dogs were dewormed only after diagnosis of a patent infection (PI). Survival analysis was used to assess factors influencing the time to first diagnosed PIs (FPI) and the time to recurrent PIs (RPI).

resultsThe overall prevalence of PIs was 4.5 %, resulting in an estimated average incidence of 0.54 PIs/dog/year. No PI was diagnosed in 67.9 % of the dogs, 17.5 % of the dogs went through only one PI and 14.6 % had > 1 PI. Prevalence of PIs always peaked during wintertime. Increased hazards for first diagnosed PIs were associated with coprophagy, geophagy, walking off-leash for ≥ 80 % of walking time, reported worms in the faeces, feeding a commercial diet and suffering from urologic or respiratory conditions. Median time to reinfection was nine months. Factors associated with increased hazards for recurrent PIs were taking corticosteroids, changing dog's main purpose, and proxies for veterinary care-seeking behaviours.

conclusionsWe concluded that targeted anthelmintic treatments in household dogs may be feasible as PIs tend to (re)occur in specific periods and in groups of dogs at high risk. Moreover, recurrent PIs appear to be influenced more by factors related to impaired immunity than environmental exposure to Toxocara eggs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntinematodal AgentsDog DiseasesDogsFamily CharacteristicsFecesParasite Egg CountPrevalenceProspective StudiesRecurrenceRisk FactorsSeasonsToxocara canisToxocariasisAntinematodal AgentsDewormingDogsLongitudinal studyRecurrent patent infectionsToxocara canis

Identifiers

PMID27716389
PMCPMC5051026
OpenAlexW2529751167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.