Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716379›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2016

Spinal cord injury: is monitoring from the injury site the future?

Samira Saadoun, Marios C Papadopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Duraplasty in acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. A review of spinal cord perfusion pressure guided interventions in traumatic spinal cord injury.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samira SaadounAcademic Neurosurgery Unit, St. George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
Marios C PapadopoulosAcademic Neurosurgery Unit, St. George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, SW17 0RE, UK. mpapadop@sgul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9174-4176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper challenges the current management of acute traumatic spinal cord injury based on our experience with monitoring from the injury site in the neurointensive care unit. We argue that the concept of bony decompression is inadequate. The concept of optimum spinal cord perfusion pressure, which differs between patients, is introduced. Such variability suggests individualized patient treatment. Failing to optimize spinal cord perfusion limits the entry of systemically administered drugs into the injured cord. We conclude that monitoring from the injury site helps optimize management and should be subjected to a trial to determine whether it improves outcome.

Indexed as

AnimalsArterial PressureBlood PressureDura MaterHumansIntensive Care UnitsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMethylprednisoloneMiceMonitoring, PhysiologicPatient-Centered CarePerfusionSpinal Cord InjuriesSteroidsSwineWounds and InjuriesMethylprednisoloneSteroidsBlood pressureClinical trialCNS injuryMicrodialysisMonitoringNeurocritical careSpinal cord injurySurgery

Identifiers

PMID27716379
PMCPMC5050726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.