Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716369›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2016

Patient survival and tumor characteristics associated with CHEK2:p.I157T - findings from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.

Taru A Muranen, Carl Blomqvist, Thilo Dörk, Anna Jakubowska, Päivi Heikkilä, Rainer Fagerholm, Dario Greco, Kristiina Aittomäki, Stig E Bojesen, Mitul Shah and 34 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Association of gene variant type and location with breast cancer risk in the general population.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Moderate-Low Risk Breast Cancer Gene Expression in a Romanian Population.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Cancers · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Germline Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes Among Women With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Mutations inJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

44 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.

Taru A MuranenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 700, 00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Carl BlomqvistDepartment of Oncology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Thilo DörkGynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Anna JakubowskaDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Päivi HeikkiläDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Rainer FagerholmDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 700, 00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Dario GrecoUnit of Systems Toxicology, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Kristiina AittomäkiDepartment of Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Stig E BojesenFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mitul ShahCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alison M DunningCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Valerie RheniusCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Per HallDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kamila CzeneDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Judith S BrandDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hatef DarabiDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jenny Chang-ClaudeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Anja RudolphDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Børge G NordestgaardFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Fergus J CouchDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Steven N HartDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jonine FigueroaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Montserrat García-ClosasDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Peter A FaschingDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias W BeckmannDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
Jingmei LiDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jianjun LiuHuman Genetics Division, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Irene L AndrulisLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Robert WinqvistLaboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre NordLab, Oulu, Finland.
Katri PylkäsLaboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre NordLab, Oulu, Finland.
Arto MannermaaCancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Vesa KatajaCancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Annika LindblomDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sara MargolinDepartment of Oncology - Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan LubinskiDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Natalia DubrowinskajaGynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Manjeet K BollaCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Joe DennisCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Kyriaki MichailidouCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Qin WangCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Douglas F EastonCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Paul D P PharoahCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Marjanka K SchmidtNetherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Heli NevanlinnaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, P.O. Box 700, 00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland. Heli.Nevanlinna@hus.fi.
University of Cambridge · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Helsinki · FIMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DENordLab · FIPomeranian Medical University · PLUniversity of Copenhagen · DKFinnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIGenome Institute of Singapore · SGGerman Cancer Research Center · DEInstitute of Cancer Research · GBKuopio University Hospital · FIMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMount Sinai Hospital · CANational Cancer Institute · USThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
Breast Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA164920 · NCI · CANCER PREVENTION INSTIT OF CALIFORNIA · PI ANDRULIS, IRENE, BUYS, SAUNDRA S · 2012 to 2017
$12.7M
Epidemiologic StudiesU19CA148065 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI AHSAN, HABIBUL, BRUGGE, JOAN SIEFERT · 2010 to 2014
$10.6M
Epidemiological and Clinical Translational Studies Post Genome-Wide AssociationU19CA148537 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EASTON, DOUGLAS FREDERICK, EELES, ROSALIND · 2010 to 2014
$10.4M
Ovarian cancer GWAS discovery, expansion and replication (N2 - Project #1)U19CA148112 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SELLERS, THOMAS A · 2010 to 2014
$10.2M
Risk and penetrance of mutations from breast cancer testing panels.R01CA192393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH, NATHANSON, KATHERINE L. · 2014 to 2018
$6.3M
A genome-wide association study for breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriersR01CA128978 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH · 2008 to 2012
$4.8M
Identifying and validating novel susceptibility genes for breast cancerR01CA176785 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH, NATHANSON, KATHERINE L. · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
BRCA2 missense mutations and breast cancerR01CA116167 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense mutations and breast cancer riskU01CA116167 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
Cancer Research UK 10118Cancer Research UK 10119Cancer Research UK 10124Cancer Research UK 16561Cancer Research UK 16565Cancer Research UK C12292/A11174Cancer Research UK C1287/A 10710Cancer Research UK C1287/A12014Cancer Research UK C5047/A10692Cancer Research UK C5047/A15007Cancer Research UK C5047/A8384Cancer Research UK C8197/A16565NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116167NCI NIH HHS R01 CA128978NCI NIH HHS R01 CA176785NCI NIH HHS R01 CA192393NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116167NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148065NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148112NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148537NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA164920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundP.I157T is a CHEK2 missense mutation associated with a modest increase in breast cancer risk. Previously, another CHEK2 mutation, the protein truncating c.1100delC has been associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer patients. Here, we have investigated patient survival and characteristics of breast tumors of germ line p.I157T carriers.

methodsWe included in the analyses 26,801 European female breast cancer patients from 15 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We analyzed the association between p.I157T and the clinico-pathological breast cancer characteristics by comparing the p.I157T carrier tumors to non-carrier and c.1100delC carrier tumors. Similarly, we investigated the p.I157T associated risk of early death, breast cancer-associated death, distant metastasis, locoregional relapse and second breast cancer using Cox proportional hazards models. Additionally, we explored the p.I157T-associated genomic gene expression profile using data from breast tumors of 183 Finnish female breast cancer patients (ten p.I157T carriers) (GEO: GSE24450). Differential gene expression analysis was performed using a moderated t test. Functional enrichment was investigated using the DAVID functional annotation tool and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). The tumors were classified into molecular subtypes according to the St Gallen 2013 criteria and the PAM50 gene expression signature.

resultsP.I157T was not associated with increased risk of early death, breast cancer-associated death or distant metastasis relapse, and there was a significant difference in prognosis associated with the two CHEK2 mutations, p.I157T and c.1100delC. Furthermore, p.I157T was associated with lobular histological type and clinico-pathological markers of good prognosis, such as ER and PR expression, low TP53 expression and low grade. Gene expression analysis suggested luminal A to be the most common subtype for p.I157T carriers and CDH1 (cadherin 1) target genes to be significantly enriched among genes, whose expression differed between p.I157T and non-carrier tumors.

conclusionsOur analyses suggest that there are fundamental differences in breast tumors of CHEK2:p.I157T and c.1100delC carriers. The poor prognosis associated with c.1100delC cannot be generalized to other CHEK2 mutations.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseAmino Acid SubstitutionBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCheckpoint Kinase 2Cluster AnalysisCodonEuropeFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Association StudiesHeterozygoteHumansNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorCheckpoint Kinase 2Codon1100delCBreast cancerCHEK2CHK2Gene expressionI157TPathologySurvival

Identifiers

PMID27716369
PMCPMC5048645
OpenAlexW2528566482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.