Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716350›Full record

ArticleDaru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2016

Opportunities and obstacles to the development of nanopharmaceuticals for human use.

Nasser Nassiri Koopaei, Mohammad Abdollahi

Erratum issuedAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Co-delivery of SN38 and rapamycin albumin bound nanoparticles against breast Cancer.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Lipid-based nanoparticles: innovations in ocular drug delivery.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The consolidation of nanomedicine.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dendrimers for Ocular Drug Delivery.Canadian journal of chemistry · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Erratum to: Opportunities and obstacles to the development of nanopharmaceuticals for human use.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nasser Nassiri KoopaeiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, USA.
Mohammad AbdollahiDepartment of Toxicology & Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Mohammad@TUMS.Ac.Ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmaceutical nanotechnology has generated breakthrough developments in improving health care and human life from its emergence. The biomaterials employed mainly aim at improving drug delivery systems, imaging and diagnostic technologies while the nanoscale materials are in widespread use in other industries such as electronics and optics. Such advancement may revolutionize the drug development and therapy with new and more efficient treatments. Although, nanotechnology assists humankind in improving its well being, it has certain limitations that entail thorough investigation by the regulatory and scientific authorities. To address concerns regarding the safety and toxicity profile of the nanopharmaceuticals, we have reviewed the challenges and solutions of nanopharmaceuticals use in human health and the related health risks. In this regard, regulatory and scientific bodies such as countries' Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), European Medicine Agency (EMA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and World Health Organization (WHO) can participate in developing and reinforcing safety measures and regulatory frameworks to insure the public health. The regulatory authorities may enforce the nanopharmaceutical industries to conduct comprehensive toxicity tests and monitor the adverse drug reaction reports in close collaboration with the scientific community to act accordingly and inform the public as the implementation of the strategy. Nanopharmaceuticals have tremendous potential for human use as therapeutic or diagnostic agents. But their toxicity profile should be well addressed and the respective regulatory framework developed and reinforced by the authorities.

Indexed as

NanostructuresPharmaceutical PreparationsAnimalsHumansLegislation, DrugNanotechnologyPharmaceutical PreparationsHuman UseNanopharmaceuticalsRegulatory FrameworkToxicity Profile

Identifiers

PMID27716350
PMCPMC5052974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.