Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716322›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2016

Spatial analysis and characteristics of pig farming in Thailand.

Weerapong Thanapongtharm, Catherine Linard, Pornpiroon Chinson, Suwicha Kasemsuwan, Marjolein Visser, Andrea E Gaughan, Michael Epprech, Timothy P Robinson, Marius Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. African Swine Fever: A One Health Perspective and Global Challenges.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Weerapong ThanapongtharmDepartment of Livestock Development (DLD), Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. weeraden@yahoo.com.
Catherine LinardLutte biologique et Ecologie spatiale (LUBIES), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, 1050, Belgium.
Pornpiroon ChinsonDepartment of Livestock Development (DLD), Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Suwicha KasemsuwanFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Kampangsaen Campus, Nakornpatom, 73140, Thailand.
Marjolein VisserResearch Unit of Landscape Ecology AND Plant Production Systems (EPSPV), University of Brussels, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Andrea E GaughanDepartment of Geography and Geosciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, 40292, USA.
Michael EpprechCentre for Development and Environment (CDE), Country office in the Lao PDR, Vientiane, 6101, Lao PDR.
Timothy P RobinsonLivestock Systems and Environment (LSE), International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, 30709, Kenya.
Marius GilbertLutte biologique et Ecologie spatiale (LUBIES), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, 1050, Belgium.

Funding

Transmission dynamics and spillover of avian influenza under changing agriculturaR01AI101028 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI XIAO, XIANGMING · 2013 to 2016
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI101028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Thailand, pig production intensified significantly during the last decade, with many economic, epidemiological and environmental implications. Strategies toward more sustainable future developments are currently investigated, and these could be informed by a detailed assessment of the main trends in the pig sector, and on how different production systems are geographically distributed. This study had two main objectives. First, we aimed to describe the main trends and geographic patterns of pig production systems in Thailand in terms of pig type (native, breeding, and fattening pigs), farm scales (smallholder and large-scale farming systems) and type of farming systems (farrow-to-finish, nursery, and finishing systems) based on a very detailed 2010 census. Second, we aimed to study the statistical spatial association between these different types of pig farming distribution and a set of spatial variables describing access to feed and markets.

resultsOver the last decades, pig population gradually increased, with a continuously increasing number of pigs per holder, suggesting a continuing intensification of the sector. The different pig-production systems showed very contrasted geographical distributions. The spatial distribution of large-scale pig farms corresponds with that of commercial pig breeds, and spatial analysis conducted using Random Forest distribution models indicated that these were concentrated in lowland urban or peri-urban areas, close to means of transportation, facilitating supply to major markets such as provincial capitals and the Bangkok Metropolitan region. Conversely the smallholders were distributed throughout the country, with higher densities located in highland, remote, and rural areas, where they supply local rural markets. A limitation of the study was that pig farming systems were defined from the number of animals per farm, resulting in their possible misclassification, but this should have a limited impact on the main patterns revealed by the analysis.

conclusionsThe very contrasted distribution of different pig production systems present opportunities for future regionalization of pig production. More specifically, the detailed geographical analysis of the different production systems will be used to spatially-inform planning decisions for pig farming accounting for the specific health, environment and economical implications of the different pig production systems.

Indexed as

Spatial AnalysisAnimal HusbandryAnimalsSwineThailandIntensive pig farmRandom forestSpatial distributionSustainable developmentTwo-part model

Identifiers

PMID27716322
PMCPMC5053203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.