Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716301›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2016

Subsidized health insurance coverage of people in the informal sector and vulnerable population groups: trends in institutional design in Asia.

Ileana Vilcu, Lilli Probst, Bayarsaikhan Dorjsuren, Inke Mathauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Building a global community of shared future free from poverty.Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ileana VilcuDepartment of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.
Lilli ProbstDepartment of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.
Bayarsaikhan DorjsurenDepartment of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.
Inke MathauerDepartment of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland. mathaueri@who.int.ORCID 0000-0002-9822-9262

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany low- and middle-income countries with a social health insurance system face challenges on their road towards universal health coverage (UHC), especially for people in the informal sector and vulnerable population groups or the informally employed. One way to address this is to subsidize their contributions through general government revenue transfers to the health insurance fund. This paper provides an overview of such health financing arrangements in Asian low- and middle-income countries. The purpose is to assess the institutional design features of government subsidized health insurance type arrangements for vulnerable and informally employed population groups and to explore how these features contribute to UHC progress.

methodsThis regional study is based on a literature search to collect country information on the specific institutional design features of such subsidization arrangements and data related to UHC progress indicators, i.e. population coverage, financial protection and access to care. The institutional design analysis focuses on eligibility rules, targeting and enrolment procedures; financing arrangements; the pooling architecture; and benefit entitlements.

resultsSuch financing arrangements currently exist in 8 countries with a total of 14 subsidization schemes. The most frequent groups covered are the poor, older persons and children. Membership in these arrangements is mostly mandatory as is full subsidization. An integrated pool for both the subsidized and the contributors exists in half of the countries, which is one of the most decisive features for equitable access and financial protection. Nonetheless, in most schemes, utilization rates of the subsidized are higher compared to the uninsured, but still lower compared to insured formal sector employees. Total population coverage rates, as well as a higher share of the subsidized in the total insured population are related with broader eligibility criteria.

conclusionsOverall, government subsidized health insurance type arrangements can be effective mechanism to help countries progress towards UHC, yet there is potential to improve on institutional design features as well as implementation.

Indexed as

Informal SectorVulnerable PopulationsAsiaChildHealthcare FinancingHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMedical AssistanceSocioeconomic FactorsUniversal Health InsuranceFinancial protectionGovernment subsidization of health insuranceUniversal health coverageVulnerable population groups

Identifiers

PMID27716301
PMCPMC5050723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.