ArticleBMC health services research2016
Identifying neuropsychiatric disorders in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey: the benefits of combining health survey and claims data.
Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlates of missed or late versus timely diagnosis of dementia in healthcare settings.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Availability and use of telehealth services among patients with ADRD enrolled in traditional Medicare vs. Medicare advantage during the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Reproducibility of the medical cost estimation from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey: Comparing claims and survey.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Treatment adequacy and remission of depression and anxiety disorders and quality of life in primary care older adults.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2021Article
- Economic burden of diabetes among medicare beneficiaries with cancer.Journal of pharmaceutical health services research : an official journal of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain · 2021Article
- Non-Cancer Chronic Pain Conditions and Risk for Incident Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study of United States Medicare Beneficiaries, 2001-2013.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- The Impact Of Medicare's Mental Health Cost-Sharing Parity On Use Of Mental Health Care Services.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2020Article
- The Association of Osteoarthritis and Related Pain Burden to Incident Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: A Retrospective Cohort Study of U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2020Article
- Measuring multimorbidity in older adults: comparing different data sources.BMC geriatrics · 2019Article
- Secondary Analysis of Existing Datasets for Dementia and Palliative Care Research: High-Value Applications and Key Considerations.Journal of palliative medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo address the impact of using multiple sources of data in the United States Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) compared to using only one source of data to identify those with neuropsychiatric diagnoses.
methodsOur data source was the 2010 MCBS with associated Medicare claims files (N = 14, 672 beneficiaries). The MCBS uses a stratified multistage probability sample design to select a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries. We excluded those participants in Medicare Health Maintenance Organizations (n = 3894) and performed a cross-sectional analysis. We classified neuropsychiatric conditions according to four broad categories: intellectual/developmental disorders, neurological conditions affecting the central nervous system (Neuro-CNS), dementia, and psychiatric conditions. To account for different baseline prevalence differences of the categories we calculated the relative increase in prevalence that occurred from adding information from claims in addition to the absolute increase to allow comparison among categories.
resultsThe estimated proportion of the sample with neuropsychiatric disorders increased to 50.0 (both sources) compared to 38.9 (health survey only) and 33.2 (claims only) with an overlap between sources of only 44.1 %. Augmenting health survey data with claims led to an increase in estimated percentage of intellectual/developmental disorders, psychiatric disorders, Neuro-CNS disorders and dementia of 1.3, 5.9, 11.5 and 3.8 respectively. In the community sample, the largest relative increases were seen for dementia (147.6 %) and Neuro-CNS disorders (87.4 %). With the exception of dementia, larger relative increases were seen in the facility sample with the greatest being for intellectual/developmental disorders (121.5 %) and Neuro-CNS disorders (93.8 %).
conclusionsThe magnitude of potentially underestimated sample proportions using health survey only data varied strikingly according to the category of diagnosis and setting. Augmentation of survey data with claims appears essential particularly when attempting to estimate proportion of the sample affected by conditions that cause cognitive impairment which may affect ability to self-report. Augmenting proxy survey data with claims data also appears to be essential when ascertaining proportion of the facility-dwelling sample affected by neuropsychiatric disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.