Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716193›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Keys to successful implementation of a French national quality indicator in health care organizations: a qualitative study.

Mathias Waelli, Marie-Léandre Gomez, Claude Sicotte, Adrian Zicari, Jean-Yves Bonnefond, Philippe Lorino, Etienne Minvielle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathias WaelliEA 7438 MOS, EHESP (French School of Public Health), Rennes, France. mathias.waelli@ehesp.fr.
Marie-Léandre GomezESSEC Business School, Cergy Pontoise, France.
Claude SicotteEA 7438 MOS, EHESP (French School of Public Health), Rennes, France.
Adrian ZicariESSEC Business School, Cergy Pontoise, France.
Jean-Yves BonnefondCNAM (International Institute of Management), Paris, France.
Philippe LorinoESSEC Business School, Cergy Pontoise, France.
Etienne MinvielleEA 7438 MOS, EHESP (French School of Public Health), Rennes, France.
École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique · FRÉcole Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales · FRConservatoire National des Arts et Métiers · FRCY Cergy Paris Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral countries have launched public reporting systems based on quality indicators (QIs) to increase transparency and improve quality in health care organizations (HCOs). However, a prerequisite to quality improvement is successful local QI implementation. The aim of this study was to explore the pathway through which a mandatory QI of the French national public reporting system, namely the quality of the anesthesia file (QAF), was put into practice.

methodSeven ethnographic case studies in French HCOs combining in situ observations and 37 semi-structured interviews.

resultsA significant proportion of potential QAF users, such as anesthetists or other health professionals were often unaware of quality data. They were, however, involved in improvement actions to meet the QAF criteria. In fact, three intertwined factors influenced QAF appropriation by anesthesia teams and impacted practice. The first factor was the action of clinical managers (chief anesthetists and head of department) who helped translate public policy into local practice largely by providing legitimacy by highlighting the scientific evidence underlying QAF, achieving consensus among team members, and pointing out the value of QAF as a means of work recognition. The two other factors related to the socio-material context, namely the coherence of information systems and the quality of interpersonal ties within the department.

conclusionsPublic policy tends to focus on the metrological validity of QIs and on ranking methods and overlooks QI implementation. However, effective QI implementation depends on local managerial activity that is often invisible, in interaction with socio-material factors. When developing national quality improvement programs, health authorities might do well to specifically target these clinical managers who act as invaluable mediators. Their key role should be acknowledged and they ought to be provided with adequate resources.

Indexed as

Anesthesia Department, HospitalFranceGroup PracticeHospitalsHumansPatient Care TeamQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareAnesthesiaHealth care organizationsImplementationQuality indicators

Identifiers

PMID27716193
PMCPMC5053143
OpenAlexW2528343235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.