Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716183›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Development of a video-based education and process change intervention to improve advance cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision-making.

Nicholas Waldron, Claire E Johnson, Peter Saul, Heidi Waldron, Jeffrey C Chong, Anne-Marie Hill, Barbara Hayes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. 'It's not magic': A qualitative analysis of geriatric physicians' explanations of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in hospital admissions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas WaldronDepartment of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Armadale Kelmscott Memorial Hospital, 3056 Albany Highway, Armadale, 6112, Western Australia, Australia.
Claire E JohnsonCancer and Palliative Care Research and Evaluation Unit, School of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Nedlands, 6009, Western Australia, Australia. claire.johnson@uwa.edu.au.
Peter SaulJohn Hunter Hospital, Lookout Rd, New Lambton Heights, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia.
Heidi WaldronClinical Teaching - Public Hospitals and Curriculum Development Communication and Clinical Practice Domain, School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, 32 Mouat St, Fremantle, 6959, Western Australia, Australia.
Jeffrey C ChongDepartment of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Armadale Kelmscott Memorial Hospital, 3056 Albany Highway, Armadale, 6112, Western Australia, Australia.
Anne-Marie HillSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Kent St, Bentley, 6102, Western Australia, Australia.
Barbara HayesAdvance Care Planning Program, Northern Health, 85 Cooper St., Epping, VIC, 3076, Australia.
The University of Notre Dame Australia · AUCurtin University · AUJohn Hunter Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decision-making and escalation of care discussions are variable in routine clinical practice. We aimed to explore physician barriers to advance CPR decision-making in an inpatient hospital setting and develop a pragmatic intervention to support clinicians to undertake and document routine advance care planning discussions.

methodsTwo focus groups, which involved eight consultants and ten junior doctors, were conducted following a review of the current literature. A subsequent iterative consensus process developed two intervention elements: (i) an updated 'Goals of Patient Care' (GOPC) form and process; (ii) an education video and resources for teaching advance CPR decision-making and communication. A multidisciplinary group of health professionals and policy-makers with experience in systems development, education and research provided critical feedback.

resultsThree key themes emerged from the focus groups and the literature, which identified a structure for the intervention: (i) knowing what to say; (ii) knowing how to say it; (iii) wanting to say it. The themes informed the development of a video to provide education about advance CPR decision-making framework, improving communication and contextualising relevant clinical issues. Critical feedback assisted in refining the video and further guided development and evolution of a medical GOPC approach to discussing and recording medical treatment and advance care plans.

conclusionThrough an iterative process of consultation and review, video-based education and an expanded GOPC form and approach were developed to address physician and systemic barriers to advance CPR decision-making and documentation. Implementation and evaluation across hospital settings is required to examine utility and determine effect on quality of care.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingVideo RecordingAdvance Care PlanningCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCommunicationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMedical RecordsMedical Staff, HospitalPhysiciansAdvance cardiopulmonary resuscitationAdvance care planningCPR decision-makingGoals of careMedical education

Identifiers

PMID27716183
PMCPMC5053041
OpenAlexW2528508447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.