Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716132›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2016

The effect of financial incentives on top of behavioral support on quit rates in tobacco smoking employees: study protocol of a cluster-randomized trial.

F A van den Brand, G E Nagelhout, B Winkens, S M A A Evers, D Kotz, N H Chavannes, C P van Schayck

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. How Financial Incentives Increase Smoking Cessation: A Two-Level Path Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

F A van den BrandDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA, Maastricht, Netherlands. f.vandenbrand@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
G E NagelhoutDepartment of Health Promotion/Family Medicine, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA, Maastricht, Netherlands.
B WinkensDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA, Maastricht, Netherlands.
S M A A EversDepartment of Health Services Research, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), Duboisdomein 30, 6229 GT, Maastricht, Netherlands.
D KotzDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA, Maastricht, Netherlands.
N H ChavannesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, 2333 ZD, Leiden, Netherlands.
C P van SchayckDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DELeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStimulating successful tobacco cessation among employees has multiple benefits. Employees who quit tobacco are healthier, more productive, less absent from work, and longer employable than employees who continue to use tobacco. Despite the evidence for these benefits of tobacco cessation, a successful method to stimulate employees to quit tobacco is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether adding a financial incentive to behavioral support (compared with no additional incentive) is effective and cost-effective in increasing abstinence rates in tobacco smoking employees participating in a smoking cessation group training. METHODS/

designIn this cluster-randomized trial employees in the intervention and control group both participate in a smoking cessation group training consisting of seven weekly counseling sessions of ninety minutes each. In addition to the training, employees in the intervention group receive a voucher as an incentive for being abstinent from smoking at the end of the training (€50), after three months (€50), after six months (€50), and after one year (€200). The control group does not receive any incentive. The primary outcome is carbon monoxide validated 12-month continuous abstinence from smoking (Russel's standard). Additionally, an economic evaluation is performed from a societal and an employer perspective. DISCUSSION: The present paper describes the methods and design of this cluster-randomized trial in detail. We hypothesize that the financial incentive for abstinence in the form of vouchers increases abstinence rates over and above the group training. The results of this study can provide important recommendations for enhancement of employee tobacco cessation.

trial registrationDutch Trial Register: NTR5657 . First received 27-01-2016.

Indexed as

MotivationOccupational Health ServicesRewardAdolescentAdultCounselingFemaleGroup ProcessesHealth PromotionHumansMaleResearch DesignSmokingSmoking CessationEmployeesIncentivesInterventionRewardSmoking cessationTobacco

Identifiers

PMID27716132
PMCPMC5053183
OpenAlexW2528710555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.