Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716125›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

DARS: a phase III randomised multicentre study of dysphagia- optimised intensity- modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) versus standard intensity- modulated radiotherapy (S-IMRT) in head and neck cancer.

Imran Petkar, Keith Rooney, Justin W G Roe, Joanne M Patterson, David Bernstein, Justine M Tyler, Marie A Emson, James P Morden, Kathrin Mertens, Elizabeth Miles and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
23.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Early MRI Blood Volume Changes in Constrictor Muscles Correlate With Postradiation Dysphagia.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. A cross-sectional retrospective and prospective service evaluation of head and neck cancer patients' swallowing and quality of life concerns: are we doing enough?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  11. Dysphagia optimized knowledge-based planning for head and neck cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Imran PetkarThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Keith RooneyNorthern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AB, UK.
Justin W G RoeThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Joanne M PattersonSpeech and Language Therapy Department, Sunderland City Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Kayll Road, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
David BernsteinThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Justine M TylerThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Marie A EmsonThe Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
James P MordenThe Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Kathrin MertensThe Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Elizabeth MilesMount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, HA6 2RN, UK.
Matthew BeasleyUniversity Hospitals Bristol, Horfield Road, Bristol, BS2 8ED, UK.
Tom RoquesNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK.
Shreerang A BhideThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Kate L NewboldThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Kevin J HarringtonThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Emma HallThe Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Christopher M NuttingThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK. Chris.Nutting@rmh.nhs.uk.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBBelfast City Hospital · GBMount Vernon Hospital · GBNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBSouth Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13407Cancer Research UK 17425Cancer Research UK C1491/A15955Cancer Research UK C7224/A13407Cancer Research UK CRUK14014/A17425Department of Health CAT-CL-03-2012-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent dysphagia following primary chemoradiation (CRT) for head and neck cancers can have a devastating impact on patients' quality of life. Single arm studies have shown that the dosimetric sparing of critical swallowing structures such as the pharyngeal constrictor muscle and supraglottic larynx can translate to better functional outcomes. However, there are no current randomised studies to confirm the benefits of such swallow sparing strategies. The aim of Dysphagia/Aspiration at risk structures (DARS) trial is to determine whether reducing the dose to the pharyngeal constrictors with dysphagia-optimised intensity- modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) will lead to an improvement in long- term swallowing function without having any detrimental impact on disease-specific survival outcomes. METHODS/

designThe DARS trial (CRUK/14/014) is a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) for patients undergoing primary (chemo) radiotherapy for T1-4, N0-3, M0 pharyngeal cancers. Patients will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to either standard IMRT (S-IMRT) or Do-IMRT. Radiotherapy doses will be the same in both groups; however in patients allocated to Do-IMRT, irradiation of the pharyngeal musculature will be reduced by delivering IMRT identifying the pharyngeal muscles as organs at risk. The primary endpoint of the trial is the difference in the mean MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) composite score, a patient-reported outcome, measured at 12 months post radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints include prospective and longitudinal evaluation of swallow outcomes incorporating a range of subjective and objective assessments, quality of life measures, loco-regional control and overall survival. Patients and speech and language therapists (SLTs) will both be blinded to treatment allocation arm to minimise outcome-reporting bias. DISCUSSION: DARS is the first RCT investigating the effect of swallow sparing strategies on improving long-term swallowing outcomes in pharyngeal cancers. An integral part of the study is the multidimensional approach to swallowing assessment, providing robust data for the standardisation of future swallow outcome measures. A translational sub- study, which may lead to the development of future predictive and prognostic biomarkers, is also planned.

trial registrationThis study is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial register, ISRCTN25458988 (04/01/2016).

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDeglutition DisordersHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckDysphagiaDysphagia-optimised intensity-modulated radiotherapyPharyngeal cancerPharyngeal constrictor muscle

Identifiers

PMID27716125
PMCPMC5052945
OpenAlexW2529631070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.