Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716113›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2016

Predictive factors of dropout from inpatient treatment for anorexia nervosa.

H Roux, A Ali, S Lambert, L Radon, C Huas, F Curt, S Berthoz, Nathalie Godart, EVHAN Group

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H RouxDépartement de Psychiatrie, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France.
A AliDépartement de Psychiatrie, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France.
S LambertService d'Addictologie, CHU Nantes, Paris, France.
L RadonDépartement de Psychiatrie, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France.
C HuasFaculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
F CurtDépartement de Psychiatrie, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France.
S BerthozDépartement de Psychiatrie, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France.
Nathalie GodartDépartement de Psychiatrie, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France. nathalie.godart@imm.fr.
EVHAN Group
Université Paris-Sud · FRInstitute Mutualiste Montsouris · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with severe Anorexia Nervosa (AN) whose condition is life-threatening or who are not receiving adequate ambulatory care are hospitalized. However, 40 % of these patients leave the hospital prematurely, without reaching the target weight set in the treatment plan, and this can compromise outcome. This study set out to explore factors predictive of dropout from hospital treatment among patients with AN, in the hope of identifying relevant therapeutic targets.

methodsFrom 2009 to 2011, 180 women hospitalized for AN (DSM-IV diagnosis) in 10 centres across France were divided into two groups: those under 18 years (when the decision to discharge belongs to the parents) and those aged 18 years and over (when the patient can legally decide to leave the hospital). Both groups underwent clinical assessment using the Morgan & Russell Global Outcome State questionnaire and the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) for assessment of eating disorder symptoms and outcome. Psychological aspects were assessed via the evaluation of anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Socio-demographic data were also collected. A number of factors identified in previous research as predictive of dropout from hospital treatment were tested using stepwise descending Cox regressions.

resultsWe found that factors predictive of dropout varied according to age groups (being under 18 as opposed to 18 and over). For participants under 18, predictive factors were living in a single-parent family, severe intake restriction as measured on the "dietary restriction" subscale of the Morgan & Russell scale, and a low patient-reported score on the EDE-Q "restraint concerns" subscale. For those over 18, dropout was predicted from a low depression score on the HADS, low level of concern about weight on the EDE-Q subscale, and lower educational status.

conclusionTo prevent dropout from hospitalization for AN, the appropriate therapeutic measures vary according to whether patients are under or over 18 years of age. Besides the therapeutic adjustments required in view of the factors identified, the high dropout rate raises the issue of resorting more frequently to compulsory care measures among adults.

Indexed as

HospitalizationAdolescentAdultAnorexia NervosaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPatient DropoutsProportional Hazards ModelsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnorexia nervosaDropoutInpatientPredictive factorTreatment

Identifiers

PMID27716113
PMCPMC5045614
OpenAlexW2524128876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.