Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27716103›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2016

Root morphology and seed and leaf ionomic traits in a Brassica napus L. diversity panel show wide phenotypic variation and are characteristic of crop habit.

C L Thomas, T D Alcock, N S Graham, R Hayden, S Matterson, L Wilson, S D Young, L X Dupuy, P J White, J P Hammond and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Drought Response in the Transcriptome and Ionome of Wild and DomesticatedPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ionomic Approaches for Discovery of Novel Stress-Resilient Genes in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

C L ThomasSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.
T D AlcockSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.
N S GrahamSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.
R HaydenSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.
S MattersonSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.
L WilsonSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.
S D YoungSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.
L X DupuyEcological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK.
P J WhiteEcological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK.
J P HammondSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development and the Centre for Food Security, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 237, Reading, RG6 6AR, UK.
J M C DankuUniversity of Aberdeen, Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Cruickshank Building, St Machar Drive, Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, UK.
D E SaltUniversity of Aberdeen, Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Cruickshank Building, St Machar Drive, Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, UK.
A SweeneyDepartment of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
I BancroftDepartment of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
M R BroadleySchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK. martin.broadley@nottingham.ac.uk.
University of Nottingham · GBJames Hutton Institute · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of York · GBUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J019631/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L000113/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L002124/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMineral nutrient uptake and utilisation by plants are controlled by many traits relating to root morphology, ion transport, sequestration and translocation. The aims of this study were to determine the phenotypic diversity in root morphology and leaf and seed mineral composition of a polyploid crop species, Brassica napus L., and how these traits relate to crop habit. Traits were quantified in a diversity panel of up to 387 genotypes: 163 winter, 127 spring, and seven semiwinter oilseed rape (OSR) habits, 35 swede, 15 winter fodder, and 40 exotic/unspecified habits. Root traits of 14 d old seedlings were measured in a 'pouch and wick' system (n = ~24 replicates per genotype). The mineral composition of 3-6 rosette-stage leaves, and mature seeds, was determined on compost-grown plants from a designed experiment (n = 5) by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

resultsSeed size explained a large proportion of the variation in root length. Winter OSR and fodder habits had longer primary and lateral roots than spring OSR habits, with generally lower mineral concentrations. A comparison of the ratios of elements in leaf and seed parts revealed differences in translocation processes between crop habits, including those likely to be associated with crop-selection for OSR seeds with lower sulphur-containing glucosinolates. Combining root, leaf and seed traits in a discriminant analysis provided the most accurate characterisation of crop habit, illustrating the interdependence of plant tissues.

conclusionsHigh-throughput morphological and composition phenotyping reveals complex interrelationships between mineral acquisition and accumulation linked to genetic control within and between crop types (habits) in B. napus. Despite its recent genetic ancestry (<10 ky), root morphology, and leaf and seed composition traits could potentially be used in crop improvement, if suitable markers can be identified and if these correspond with suitable agronomy and quality traits.

Indexed as

PhenotypeBrassica napusCrops, AgriculturalGenotypePlant LeavesPlant RootsSeedsCanolaHigh-throughput phenotypingIonomicsLeaf/seed elemental ratiosMineral concentrationRoot morphologySeed size

Identifiers

PMID27716103
PMCPMC5050600
OpenAlexW2528700472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.