ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Identification of large disjoint motifs in biological networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- QOMIC: quantum optimization for motif identification.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Compression-based inference of network motif sets.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Subgraphs of Interest Social Networks for Diffusion Dynamics Prediction.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Review of tools and algorithms for network motif discovery in biological networks.IET systems biology · 2020Review
- Disjoint motif discovery in biological network using pattern join method.IET systems biology · 2019Article
- Replication timing networks reveal a link between transcription regulatory circuits and replication timing control.Genome research · 2019Article
- Characterizing building blocks of resource constrained biological networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Application of dynamic expansion tree for finding large network motifs in biological networks.PeerJ · 2019Article
- SuperNoder: a tool to discover over-represented modular structures in networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Counting motifs in dynamic networks.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiological networks provide great potential to understand how cells function. Network motifs, frequent topological patterns, are key structures through which biological networks operate. Finding motifs in biological networks remains to be computationally challenging task as the size of the motif and the underlying network grow. Often, different copies of a given motif topology in a network share nodes or edges. Counting such overlapping copies introduces significant problems in motif identification.
resultsIn this paper, we develop a scalable algorithm for finding network motifs. Unlike most of the existing studies, our algorithm counts independent copies of each motif topology. We introduce a set of small patterns and prove that we can construct any larger pattern by joining those patterns iteratively. By iteratively joining already identified motifs with those patterns, our algorithm avoids (i) constructing topologies which do not exist in the target network (ii) repeatedly counting the frequency of the motifs generated in subsequent iterations. Our experiments on real and synthetic networks demonstrate that our method is significantly faster and more accurate than the existing methods including SUBDUE and FSG.
conclusionsWe conclude that our method for finding network motifs is scalable and computationally feasible for large motif sizes and a broad range of networks with different sizes and densities. We proved that any motif with four or more edges can be constructed as a join of the small patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.