ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017
Successful participation of patients in interprofessional team meetings: A qualitative study.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Information exchange or discussion? A qualitative study on cross-sectoral collaboration between social security service and healthcare service for patients with chronic fatigue.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Opportunities and difficulties with providing child healthcare through team-based visits in child healthcare services - a focus group study.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Frontline staff perspectives on multi-disciplinary team working and the effectiveness of integrated service delivery: Findings from the evaluation of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneers in England.Journal of health services research & policy · 2025Article
- Patient and Support Person Satisfaction Following a Whole Health-Informed Interdisciplinary Pain Team Meeting.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024Article
- Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration in general and during multidisciplinary team meetings in long-term care and geriatric rehabilitation: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Participation in Multidisciplinary Teams Among Healthcare Professionals: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Tertiary Public Hospitals in China.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Implementation of best practice goal-setting in five rehabilitation services: A mixed-methods evaluation study.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
- Patients' Perspectives of Interprofessional Collaboration in Breast Cancer Unit.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development of a toolkit to improve interprofessional collaboration and integration in primary care using qualitative interviews and co-design workshops.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Empowering Patients With a Shared Communication Tool: A Patient-Oriented Multimethods Pilot Study.Journal of patient experience · 2023Article
- A Rapid Review of the Factors That Influence Service User Involvement in Interprofessional Education, Practice, and Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Assuring patient participation and care continuity in intermediate care: Getting the most out of family meetings using the four habits model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Developing tailored theoretically informed goal-setting interventions for rehabilitation services: a co-design approach.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Observations of community-based multidisciplinary team meetings in health and social care for older people with long term conditions in England.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The practice environment's influence on patient participation in intermediate healthcare services - the perspectives of patients, relatives and healthcare professionals.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Patients' Experiences of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Journal of patient experience · 2020Article
- Framework for patient, family-centred care within an Australian Community Hospital: development and description.BMJ open quality · 2020Review
- Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary Tumor Conferences from the Providers' Perspective: Is It Feasible in Routine Cancer Care?Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumour conferences in breast cancer care (PINTU): a mixed-methods study protocol.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Suitability of a Programme for Improving Interprofessional Primary Care Team Meetings.International journal of integrated care · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of people with multiple chronic conditions increases as a result of ageing. To deal with the complex health-care needs of these patients, it is important that health-care professionals collaborate in interprofessional teams. To deliver patient-centred care, it is often recommended to include the patient as a member of the team.
objectiveTo gain more insight into how health-care professionals and patients, who are used to participate in interprofessional team meetings, experience and organize patient participation in the team meetings.
methodsA qualitative study including observations of meetings (n=8), followed by semi-structured interviews with participating health-care professionals (n=8), patients and/or relatives (n=11). Professionals and patients were asked about their experiences of patient participation immediately after the team meetings. Results from both observations and interviews were analysed using content analysis.
resultsThe findings show a variety of influencing factors related to patient participation that can be divided into five categories: (i) structure and task distribution, (ii) group composition, (iii) relationship between professionals and patients or relatives, (iv) patients' characteristics and (v) the purpose of the meeting.
conclusionPatient participation during team meetings was appreciated by professionals and patients. A tailored approach to patient involvement during team meetings is preferable. When considering the presence of patients in team meetings, it is recommended to pay attention to patients' willingness and ability to participate, and the necessary information shared before the meeting. Participating patients seem to appreciate support and preparation for the meeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.