Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27714815›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2017

Osteoclast Fusion: Time-Lapse Reveals Involvement of CD47 and Syncytin-1 at Different Stages of Nuclearity.

Anaïs Marie Julie Møller, Jean-Marie Delaissé, Kent Søe

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Cell fusion in osteoclastogenesis.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Beyond resorption: osteoclasts as drivers of bone formation.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cell Fusion and Syncytia Formation in Cancer.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  15. Virus-Induced Cell Fusion and Syncytia Formation.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Role and Regulation of Transcription Factors in Osteoclastogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Intrinsic signalling factors associated with cancer cell-cell fusion.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anaïs Marie Julie MøllerDepartment of Clinical Cell Biology, Vejle Hospital/Lillebaelt Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Jean-Marie DelaisséDepartment of Clinical Cell Biology, Vejle Hospital/Lillebaelt Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Kent SøeDepartment of Clinical Cell Biology, Vejle Hospital/Lillebaelt Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Lillebaelt Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKVejle Sygehus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigations addressing the molecular keys of osteoclast fusion are primarily based on end-point analyses. No matter if investigations are performed in vivo or in vitro the impact of a given factor is predominantly analyzed by counting the number of multi-nucleated cells, the number of nuclei per multinucleated cell or TRAcP activity. But end-point analyses do not show how the fusion came about. This would not be a problem if fusion of osteoclasts was a random process and occurred by the same molecular mechanism from beginning to end. However, we and others have in the recent period published data suggesting that fusion partners may specifically select each other and that heterogeneity between the partners seems to play a role. Therefore, we set out to directly test the hypothesis that fusion factors have a heterogenic involvement at different stages of nuclearity. Therefore, we have analyzed individual fusion events using time-lapse and antagonists of CD47 and syncytin-1. All time-lapse recordings have been studied by two independent observers. A total of 1808 fusion events were analyzed. The present study shows that CD47 and syncytin-1 have different roles in osteoclast fusion depending on the nuclearity of fusion partners. While CD47 promotes cell fusions involving mono-nucleated pre-osteoclasts, syncytin-1 promotes fusion of two multi-nucleated osteoclasts, but also reduces the number of fusions between mono-nucleated pre-osteoclasts. Furthermore, CD47 seems to mediate fusion mostly through broad contact surfaces between the partners' cell membrane while syncytin-1 mediate fusion through phagocytic-cup like structure. J. Cell. Physiol. 232: 1396-1403, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Time-Lapse ImagingCD47 AntigenCell FusionCell NucleusGene Products, envHumansModels, BiologicalOsteoclastsPhenotypePregnancy ProteinsCD47 AntigenGene Products, envPregnancy Proteinssyncytin

Identifiers

PMID27714815
PMCPMC6221100
OpenAlexW2531316908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.