Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27714796›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2016

Genomic imprinting, disrupted placental expression, and speciation.

Thomas D Brekke, Lindy A Henry, Jeffrey M Good

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Genes · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sex-biased demography modulates male harm across the genome.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Canonical and Non-canonical Genomic Imprinting in Rodents.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Thomas D BrekkeDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 59812.
Lindy A HenryDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 59812.
Jeffrey M GoodDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 59812.
University of Montana · US

Funding

Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation and the developmental basis of hybrid male stR01HD073439 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI GOOD, JEFFREY · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of regulatory incompatibilities to the early stages of speciation remains unclear. Hybrid mammals often show extreme parent-of-origin growth effects that are thought to be a consequence of disrupted genetic imprinting (parent-specific epigenetic gene silencing) during early development. Here, we test the long-standing hypothesis that abnormal hybrid growth reflects disrupted gene expression due to loss of imprinting (LOI) in hybrid placentas, resulting in dosage imbalances between paternal growth factors and maternal growth repressors. We analyzed placental gene expression in reciprocal dwarf hamster hybrids that show extreme parent-of-origin growth effects relative to their parental species. In massively enlarged hybrid placentas, we observed both extensive transgressive expression of growth-related genes and biallelic expression of many genes that were paternally silenced in normal sized hybrids. However, the apparent widespread disruption of paternal silencing was coupled with reduced gene expression levels overall. These patterns are contrary to the predictions of the LOI model and indicate that hybrid misexpression of dosage-sensitive genes is caused by other regulatory mechanisms in this system. Collectively, our results support a central role for disrupted gene expression and imprinting in the evolution of mammalian hybrid inviability, but call into question the generality of the widely invoked LOI model.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionGenetic SpeciationGenomic ImprintingAnimalsFemaleHybridization, GeneticMalePhodopusPlacentationPregnancyGene expressionhybrid inviabilityhybridizationPhodopus

Identifiers

PMID27714796
PMCPMC5123974
OpenAlexW2528234817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.