Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27714769›Full record

Trial reportActa neurologica Scandinavica2017

Lacosamide and sodium channel-blocking antiepileptic drug cross-titration against levetiracetam background therapy.

M Baulac, W Byrnes, P Williams, S Borghs, E Webster, M De Backer, P Dedeken

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta neurologica Scandinavica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01484977 (Open-label, Single Arm, Study Evaluating Tolerability and Efficacy of Lacosamide When Added to Levetiracetam With Withdrawal of Concomitant Sodium Channel Blocking Antiepileptic Drug in Subjects With Uncontrolled Partial-onset Seizures), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01484977 phase3completednot on this map

Open-label, Single Arm, Study Evaluating Tolerability and Efficacy of Lacosamide When Added to Levetiracetam With Withdrawal of Concomitant Sodium Channel Blocking Antiepileptic Drug in Subjects With Uncontrolled Partial-onset Seizures

TypeinterventionalSponsorUCB PharmaRan2011 to 2013Enrolled120ConditionsEpilepsyArmsLacosamide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

M BaulacPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, IHU-ICM, Paris, France.
W ByrnesUCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC, USA.
P WilliamsUCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC, USA.
S BorghsUCB Pharma, Slough, UK.
E WebsterUCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC, USA.
M De BackerUCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium.
P DedekenUCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium.
UCB Pharma (United States) · USUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BESorbonne Université · FRUCB Pharma (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess prospectively the effectiveness of lacosamide (LCM) added to levetiracetam (LEV) after down-titration of a concomitant sodium channel blocker (SCB) among patients with focal epilepsy not adequately controlled on LEV and SCB.

methodsIn this open-label trial, LCM was initiated at 100 mg/day and up-titrated to 200-600 mg/day over 9 weeks; SCB down-titration started when LCM dose reached 200 mg/day. Patients remained on stable LCM/LEV doses for 12 weeks' maintenance (21-week treatment period). The primary outcome was retention rate on LCM.

resultsDue to recruitment challenges, fewer than the planned 300 patients participated in the trial, resulting in the trial being underpowered. Overall, 120 patients (mean age 39.7 years) started and 93 completed the trial. The most frequently used SCBs were lamotrigine (39.2%), carbamazepine (30.8%) and oxcarbazepine (27.5%). Eighty-four patients adhered to protocol and discontinued their SCB after cross-titration, but there was insufficient evidence for 36 patients. Retention rate was 73.3% (88/120) for all patients and 83.3% (70/84) for those with evidence of SCB discontinuation. Seizure freedom for patients completing maintenance was 14.0% (13/93). Discontinuation due to adverse events (6.7%) and lack of efficacy (3.3%) occurred primarily during cross-titration. Most frequently reported adverse events during treatment were dizziness (23.3%), headache (15.0%) and fatigue (8.3%).

conclusionsIn patients with uncontrolled seizures on LEV/SCB, the LCM/LEV combination appeared to be effective and well tolerated. A cross-titration schedule-flexible LCM up-titration, concomitant SCB down-titration and stable background LEV-could present a feasible and practical approach to initiating LCM while minimizing pharmacodynamic interactions with a SCB.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAdultAnticonvulsantsDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationEpilepsies, PartialFemaleHumansLacosamideLevetiracetamMaleMiddle AgedPiracetamSodium Channel BlockersAcetamidesAnticonvulsantsLacosamideLevetiracetamPiracetamSodium Channel Blockersantiepileptic drugscross-titrationepilepsyseizurestreatment

Identifiers

PMID27714769
PMCPMC5347878
OpenAlexW2529858768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.