Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27714681›Full record

GuidelineHepatology international2017

Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) consensus guidelines on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a 2016 update.

Gamal Shiha, Alaa Ibrahim, Ahmed Helmy, Shiv Kumar Sarin, Masao Omata, Ashish Kumar, David Bernstien, Hitushi Maruyama, Vivek Saraswat, Yogesh Chawla and 23 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Hepatology international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03176797 (Quantitative Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis on Multiparametric MRI), which is not on this map. Cited by 124 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03176797 naunknown statusnot on this map

Quantitative Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis on Multiparametric MRI

TypeinterventionalSponsorZhujiang HospitalRan2017 to 2025Enrolled300ConditionsLiver Fibrosis, CirrhosisArmsLiver MRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 20 institutions in 14 countries.

Gamal ShihaInternal Medicine Department, El-Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. g_shiha@hotmail.com.
Alaa IbrahimDepartment of Internal medicine, University of Benha, Benha, Egypt.
Ahmed HelmyDepartment of Tropical Medicine & Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Shiv Kumar SarinDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS), New Delhi, India.
Masao OmataDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ashish KumarDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Ganga Ram Institute for Postgraduate Medical Education & Research of Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
David BernstienDivision of Hepatology, North Shore University Hospital and Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Hitushi MaruyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Chiba Prefecture, Japan.
Vivek SaraswatDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Yogesh ChawlaPost Graduate Institute of Medial Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Saeed HamidDepartment of Medicine, The Aga Khan University & Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zaigham AbbasDepartment of Hepatogastroenterology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan.
Pierre BedossaDepartment of Pathology, Physiology and Imaging, University Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
Puja SakhujaGovind Ballabh Pant Hospital, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Mamun ElmahatabDepartment of Hepatology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Seng Gee LimDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Laurentius LesmanaDepartment of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Jose SollanoUniversity of Santo Tomas, España Blvd, Manila, Philippines.
Ji-Dong JiaLiver Research Centre at the Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital University in Beijing, Beijing, China.
Bahaa AbbasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Military Medical Academy, Cairo, Egypt.
Ashraf OmarTropical Medicine Department, Cairo Medical School, Cairo, Egypt.
Barjesh SharmaDepartment of Gastroenterology, GB Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Diana PayawalSection of Gastroenterology, Cardinal Santos Medical Center, San Juan City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Ahmed AbdallahPediatric Hospital, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Abdelhamid SerwahCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdelkhalek HamedHepatology and Diabetes Unit, Military Medical Academy, Cairo, Egypt.
Aly ElsayedHepatology & GIT Department, AHF Center Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Amany AbdelMaqsodInternal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Cairo University, Liver Transplant Unit Manial Hospital and Liver ICU French Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Tarek HassaneinChula Vista Medical Center, Chula Vista, CA, USA.
Ahmed IhabMolecular Pathology Unit & Research Group, German University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.
Hamsik GHaziuanDepartment of Hepatology, Nork Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Yerevan, Armenia.
Nizar ZeinDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.
Manoj KumarDepartment of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS), New Delhi, India.
Cairo University · EGInstitute of Liver and Biliary Sciences · INMilitary Medical Academy · EGAga Khan University · PKAssiut University · EGBangladesh Medical University · BDBeijing Friendship Hospital · CNBenha University · EGChiba University · JPCleveland Clinic · USDélégation Paris 7 · FREmirates Foundation · AEGerman University in Cairo · EGGovind Ballabh Pant Hospital · INHospital for Tropical Diseases · VNMansoura University · EGMansoura University Hospital · EGMaulana Azad Medical College · INNational University of Singapore · SGNorth Shore University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatic fibrosis is a common pathway leading to liver cirrhosis, which is the end result of any injury to the liver. Accurate assessment of the degree of fibrosis is important clinically, especially when treatments aimed at reversing fibrosis are being evolved. Despite the fact that liver biopsy (LB) has been considered the "gold standard" of assessment of hepatic fibrosis, LB is not favored by patients or physicians owing to its invasiveness, limitations, sampling errors, etc. Therefore, many alternative approaches to assess liver fibrosis are gaining more popularity and have assumed great importance, and many data on such approaches are being generated. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) set up a working party on liver fibrosis in 2007, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines on various aspects of liver fibrosis relevant to disease patterns and clinical practice in the Asia-Pacific region. The first consensus guidelines of the APASL recommendations on hepatic fibrosis were published in 2009. Due to advances in the field, we present herein the APASL 2016 updated version on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis. The process for the development of these consensus guidelines involved review of all available published literature by a core group of experts who subsequently proposed consensus statements followed by discussion of the contentious issues and unanimous approval of the consensus statements. The Oxford System of the evidence-based approach was adopted for developing the consensus statements using the level of evidence from one (highest) to five (lowest) and grade of recommendation from A (strongest) to D (weakest). The topics covered in the guidelines include invasive methods (LB and hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements), blood tests, conventional radiological methods, elastography techniques and cost-effectiveness of hepatic fibrosis assessment methods, in addition to fibrosis assessment in special and rare situations.

Indexed as

BiopsyConsensusCost-Benefit AnalysisElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansLiver CirrhosisObserver VariationChronic liver diseaseCirrhosisGraft fibrosisHepatitis BHepatitis CInvasive assessment, non-invasive assessmentLiver fibrosisNon-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Identifiers

PMID27714681
OpenAlexW2528921242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.