Observational studyInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2016
Drug utilization study of systemic antifungal agents in a Brazilian tertiary care hospital.
Observational study in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Patterns and Appropriateness of Systemic Antifungal Prescriptions in a Regional Hospital in Hong Kong.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antifungal Resistance Among Candida Species: Diagnostic and Clinical Challenges in Specialized Cancer Care Hospital of Lahore.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
- Clinical pharmacist-led antifungal drug utilization reviews in cancer care hospital: a prospective audit and feedback.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024Article
- Consensus for antifungal stewardship in China (2024 edition).Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Antifungal stewardship: the Latin American experience.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023Review
- Study of Prescription-Indication of Outpatient Systemic Anti-Fungals in a Colombian Population. A Cross-Sectional Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Pharmacist review of high-risk haematology outpatients to improve appropriateness of antifungal prophylaxis.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020Article
- Adherence to Antifungal Guidelines in Malignant Hematology Patients: A Review of the Literature.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2019Review
- Evaluation of Candida bloodstream infection and antifungal utilization in a tertiary care hospital.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Appropriateness of antifungal prescribing in Oman.Pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The inappropriate use of systemic antifungal agents can result in unnecessary exposure, adverse events, increased microbial resistance and increased costs. Aim This study analysed the use of systemic antifungal agents and adherence to treatment guidelines for fungal infections. Setting A Brazilian tertiary hospital. Methods This cross-sectional study investigated 183 patients who were treated with systemic antifungals. Antifungal drugs were classified according to the fourth level of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. The appropriateness of treatments was analysed with respect to the indication, dose and potential drug-drug interactions. Descriptive and univariate statistical analyses were performed. The main outcome measure was the frequency of adherence to treatment guidelines for fungal infections. Results The number of established treatments was 320, with 163 (50.9 %) pre-emptive, 63 (19.7 %) targeted, 56 (17.5 %) empirical and 38 (11.9 %) prophylactic treatments. The overall adherence to the treatment guidelines was 29.4 %. The proportion of appropriate treatment considering indication, dosage and drug-drug interactions was 84.1, 67.8 and 47.2 %, respectively. The most commonly prescribed systemic antifungal agents were fluconazole in 170 (53.1 %), voriconazole in 43 (13.4 %) and amphotericin B deoxycholate in 36 (11.3 %) cases. Conclusion The study showed a low proportion of appropriate antifungal drug use; the dosage and drug-drug interactions criteria were the determining factors for the high percentage of non-adherence to treatment guidelines in the hospital. The profile of antifungal agents used showed the predominance of fluconazole as well as the use of new antifungal drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.