Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27714584›Full record

ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2016

Contemporary management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Ajay Yadlapati, Mark Gajjar, Daniel R Schimmel, Mark J Ricciardi, James D Flaherty

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ajay YadlapatiDivision of Cardiology, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Suite 600, Chicago, IL, 60611-2996, USA.
Mark GajjarDivision of Cardiology, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Suite 600, Chicago, IL, 60611-2996, USA.
Daniel R SchimmelDivision of Cardiology, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Suite 600, Chicago, IL, 60611-2996, USA.
Mark J RicciardiDivision of Cardiology, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Suite 600, Chicago, IL, 60611-2996, USA.
James D FlahertyDivision of Cardiology, Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, Suite 600, Chicago, IL, 60611-2996, USA. jflahert@nm.org.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), which constitutes nearly 25-40 % of current acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cases, is a medical emergency that requires prompt recognition and treatment. Since the 2013 STEMI practice guidelines, a wealth of additional data that may further advance optimal STEMI practices has emerged. These data highlight the importance of improving patient treatment and transport algorithms for STEMI from non-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers. In addition, a focus on the reduction of total pain-to-balloon (P2B) times rather than simply door-to-balloon (D2B) times may further improve outcomes after primary PCI for STEMI. The early administration of newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors, including crushed forms of these agents for faster absorption, represents another treatment advancement. Recent data also suggest avoiding concurrent morphine use due to interactions with P2Y12 inhibitors. Furthermore, new technological advancements and investigational therapies, including Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds and the use of pre-intervention intravenous microbubbles with transthoracic ultrasound, hold promise to play a useful role in future STEMI care. Despite these advancements, the prompt recognition of STEMI, at both the patient and health care system level, remains the cornerstone of optimal treatment.

Indexed as

Time FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnalgesicsClopidogrelHumansMorphineMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPractice Guidelines as TopicPrasugrel HydrochlorideST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTiclopidineAnalgesicsClopidogrelMorphinePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrasugrel HydrochlorideTiclopidineEvolutionGuidelinesPerfusionSTEMI

Identifiers

PMID27714584
OpenAlexW2528064798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.