Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27714485›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2017

A Pilot Study of Fragile X Syndrome Screening in Pregnant Women and Women Planning Pregnancy: Implementation, Acceptance, Awareness, and Geographic Factors.

Ramona Alfaro Arenas, Jordi Rosell Andreo, Damián Heine Suñer, Group for the study of FXS in the Balearic Islands

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Informed decision making and psychosocial outcomes in pregnant and nonpregnant women offered population fragile X carrier screening.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ramona Alfaro ArenasSección Genética Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain.
Jordi Rosell AndreoSección Genética Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain. Jordi.rosell@ssib.es.
Damián Heine SuñerSección Genética Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain. damian.heine@ssib.es.
Group for the study of FXS in the Balearic Islands
Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands · ESCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report herein results of a study performed in the Balearic Islands which had the following goals: 1) Determine the proportion of pregnant or non-pregnant women planning pregnancy, who would choose to undergo a screening test for Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), if it is accompanied by the appropriate information; 2) Assess satisfaction and any increase in stress among women who participate in screening; 3) Collect epidemiological information about the incidence of the disease in our population; and 4) Collect demographic and health history data and assess participants' awareness of the disease. Screening was performed on 3,731 pregnant and non-pregnant women of childbearing age and the results indicate: a very high voluntary rate of participation; a high level of self-reported satisfaction and low levels of stress because of the test; a very high incidence of premutation (1/106) in our population; and a low level of awareness about the existence of FXS (25 %). Additional findings indicate no significant correlation between self-reported health history and premutation detection, and the high premutation incidence does not seem to be specific to the indigenous Balearic population. Based on these results, we discuss the pros and cons of an implementation of preconception and pregnant women screening for FXS within a public health screening program.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CarePrenatal DiagnosisAdultFamily Planning ServicesFemaleFragile X SyndromeGeographyHumansPilot ProjectsPregnancySpainAwarenessFragile X syndromeIntellectual disabilityNeurogenetic disorderReproductive geneticsSatisfactionScreeningStress

Identifiers

PMID27714485
OpenAlexW2528013797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.