Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27714470›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2017

Oak protein profile alterations upon root colonization by an ectomycorrhizal fungus.

Mónica Sebastiana, Joana Martins, Andreia Figueiredo, Filipa Monteiro, Jordi Sardans, Josep Peñuelas, Anabela Silva, Peter Roepstorff, Maria Salomé Pais, Ana Varela Coelho

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mónica SebastianaPlant Functional Genomics Unit, Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Faculty of Sciences, Lisbon University, Campo Grande, Edificio C2, piso 4, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal. mgsebastiana@fc.ul.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8735-7632
Joana MartinsInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Avenida da Republica, 2780-s157, Oeiras, Portugal.
Andreia FigueiredoPlant Functional Genomics Unit, Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Faculty of Sciences, Lisbon University, Campo Grande, Edificio C2, piso 4, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal.
Filipa MonteiroPlant Functional Genomics Unit, Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Faculty of Sciences, Lisbon University, Campo Grande, Edificio C2, piso 4, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jordi SardansCSIC, Global Ecology Unit, CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08193, Catalonia, Spain.
Josep PeñuelasCSIC, Global Ecology Unit, CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08193, Catalonia, Spain.
Anabela SilvaPlant Functional Genomics Unit, Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Faculty of Sciences, Lisbon University, Campo Grande, Edificio C2, piso 4, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal.
Peter RoepstorffDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Maria Salomé PaisPlant Functional Genomics Unit, Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute (BioISI), Faculty of Sciences, Lisbon University, Campo Grande, Edificio C2, piso 4, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Varela CoelhoInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Avenida da Republica, 2780-s157, Oeiras, Portugal.
University of Lisbon · PTCentre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications · ESUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increased knowledge on the real impacts of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis in forest species is needed to optimize forest sustainable productivity and thus to improve forest services and their capacity to act as carbon sinks. In this study, we investigated the response of an oak species to ectomycorrhizae formation using a proteomics approach complemented by biochemical analysis of carbohydrate levels. Comparative proteome analysis between mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal cork oak plants revealed no differences at the foliar level. However, the protein profile of 34 unique oak proteins was altered in the roots. Consistent with the results of the biochemical analysis, the proteome analysis of the mycorrhizal roots suggests a decreasing utilization of sucrose for the metabolic activity of mycorrhizal roots which is consistent with an increased allocation of carbohydrates from the plant to the fungus in order to sustain the symbiosis. In addition, a promotion of protein unfolding mechanisms, attenuation of defense reactions, increased nutrient mobilization from the plant-fungus interface (N and P), as well as cytoskeleton rearrangements and induction of plant cell wall loosening for fungal root accommodation in colonized roots are also suggested by the results. The suggested improvement in root capacity to take up nutrients accompanied by an increase of root biomass without apparent changes in aboveground biomass strongly re-enforces the potential of mycorrhizal inoculation to improve cork oak forest resistance capacity to cope with coming climate change.

Indexed as

BasidiomycotaBiomassCytoskeletonGene Expression Regulation, PlantLipid MetabolismMycorrhizaePlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPlant RootsQuercusRNA, MessengerRNA, PlantStress, PhysiologicalSymbiosisPlant ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, PlantCork oakDifferential in gel electrophoresis (DIGE)EctomycorrhizaeMass spectrometryProteomeSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID27714470
OpenAlexW2529357778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.