ArticleHerz2017
Serum total bilirubin levels and disease severity in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Article in Herz, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of bilirubin in the prognosis of coronary artery disease and its relationship with cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Pooled it
- The Role of Serum Biomarkers for the Differential Diagnosis and Prognostic Assessment of Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Interpretable machine learning of non-traditional lipid indices for diagnostic classification of CHD in patients with comorbid MASLD and T2DM: a multicenter study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Association between Initial Serum Total Bilirubin and Clinical Outcome in Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries.International journal of medical sciences · 2022Article
- Prognostic Value of Serum Total Bilirubin after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.BioMed research international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimSerum total bilirubin (STB), a protective cardiovascular factor, was retrospectively investigated to determine the relationship between STB levels and the severity of disease in Chinese patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 347 eligible patients presenting to our department from December 2007 to December 2012 were divided into tertiles according to their Syntax scores (low, moderate, and high). To clarify the association between STB levels and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all patients were divided into two groups according to the median baseline STB (greater than or less than 13.2 μmol/l), which was measured after at least 12-h fast. All participants were followed for a mean of 37.1 months for MACE, including all-cause death, recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction, and recurrent percutaneous coronary intervention.
resultsThe STB levels were significantly lower in the high Syntax score group than those of the other groups and were negatively correlated with the Syntax score and number of diseased vessels. Follow-up data showed a higher incidence of MACE in the low STB group compared with the high STB group. Elevated STB levels predict the long-term prognosis of patients with stable angina pectoris. Finally, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly higher event-free survival rate in the patients with high STB levels than those in the low STB group.
conclusionsSTB levels were independently associated with the severity of disease in patients with stable CAD. Elevated STB is associated with cardiovascular events and may be useful as a biomarker of the severity and prognosis of stable CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.