Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27714404›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2017

The influence of motor imagery on the learning of a fine hand motor skill.

Jagna Sobierajewicz, Anna Przekoracka-Krawczyk, Wojciech Jaśkowski, Willem B Verwey, Rob van der Lubbe

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04744597 (Neural Aspects of Motor Learning Through Real Execution and Motor Imagery in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04744597 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Neural Aspects of Motor Learning Through Real Execution and Motor Imagery in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorScience and Research Centre KoperRan2021 to 2021Enrolled45ConditionsHealthyArmsReal execution of Fitts's law tasks, Motor imagery of Fitts's law tasks, Skip counting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jagna SobierajewiczDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, University of Finance and Management, Warsaw, Poland. jagnasobierajewicz@gmail.com.
Anna Przekoracka-KrawczykVision and Neuroscience Laboratory, NanoBioMedical Centre, Adam Mickiewicza University, Umultowska 85, 61-614, Poznan, Poland.
Wojciech JaśkowskiInstitute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland.
Willem B VerweyCognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Rob van der LubbeDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, University of Finance and Management, Warsaw, Poland.
University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw · PLAdam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PLPoznań University of Technology · PLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor imagery has been argued to affect the acquisition of motor skills. The present study examined the specificity of motor imagery on the learning of a fine hand motor skill by employing a modified discrete sequence production task: the Go/NoGo DSP task. After an informative cue, a response sequence had either to be executed, imagined, or withheld. To establish learning effects, the experiment was divided into a practice phase and a test phase. In the latter phase, we compared mean response times and accuracy during the execution of unfamiliar sequences, familiar imagined sequences, and familiar executed sequences. The electroencephalogram was measured in the practice phase to compare activity between motor imagery, motor execution, and a control condition in which responses should be withheld. Event-related potentials (ERPs) and event-related lateralizations (ERLs) showed strong similarities above cortical motor areas on trials requiring motor imagery and motor execution, while a major difference was found with trials on which the response sequence should be withheld. Behavioral results from the test phase showed that response times and accuracy improved after physical and mental practice relative to unfamiliar sequences (so-called sequence-specific learning effects), although the effect of motor learning by motor imagery was smaller than the effect of physical practice. These findings confirm that motor imagery also resembles motor execution in the case of a fine hand motor skill.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCuesElectroencephalographyElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHandHumansImagery, PsychotherapyInhibition, PsychologicalLearningMaleMotor SkillsPhotic StimulationPrincipal Component AnalysisEEGEvent-related lateralizationsEvent-related potentialsGo/NoGo DSP taskMotor imageryMotor learning

Identifiers

PMID27714404
OpenAlexW2527678424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.