ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2016
Current understanding in source control management in septic shock patients: a review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of damage control surgery in the treatment of perforated colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Pooled it
- Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children.Intensive care medicine · 2020Guideline
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Precision Approaches to Carbapenem-Resistant Infections in the ICU: Integrating Diagnostics, Stewardship, and Novel Therapies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Burkitt's lymphoma of the appendix presented with acute appendicitis and ascites.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Legends, dogmas, presumptions, and demystifications in antibiotic therapy.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025Review
- Review
- Do the Results of Bile Cultures Affect the Outcomes of Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Ascending Cholangitis? A Single Center Prospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of sepsis in patients with malignancy.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Acute Kidney Injury in Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The Interventions and Challenges of Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Emergency Department.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Management of Bacterial and Fungal Infections in the ICU: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention Recommendations.Infection and drug resistance · 2023Review
- Pediatric Sepsis: a Summary of Current Definitions and Management Recommendations.Current pediatrics reports · 2023Review
- Body computed tomography in sepsis: predictors of CT findings and patient outcomes in a retrospective medical ICU cohort study.Emergency radiology · 2022Article
- Omental plug using double horizontal mattress suture for gastric perforation on elderly patients with boey score 3: A case series.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- The role of procalcitonin in reducing antibiotics across the surgical pathway.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Review
- PET/CT Imaging for Personalized Management of Infectious Diseases.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Antimicrobial Treatment Duration in Sepsis and Serious Infections.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2020Review
- Factors associated with outcomes of septic shock patients receiving high dose noradrenaline according to three primary infection sites.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Infection, Sepsis and the Inflammatory Response: Mechanisms and Therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis and septic shock is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Antibiotics, fluid resuscitation support of vital organ function and source control are the cornerstones for the treatment of these patients. Source control measures include all those actions taken in the process of care to control the foci of infection and to restore optimal function of the site of infection. Source control represents the multidisciplinary team required in order to optimize critical care for septic shock patients. In the last decade an increase interest on fluids, vasopressors, antibiotics, and organ support techniques in all aspects whether time, dose and type of any of those have been described. However information of source control measures involving minimal invasion and new techniques, time of action and outcome without it, is scarce. In this review the authors resumes new information, recommendations and future directions on this matter when facing the more common types of infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.