ReviewPrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2016
Alternative staging of regional lymph nodes in gastric cancer.
Review in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Short-term outcomes of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- A prognostic nomogram based on log odds of positive lymph nodes to predict survival in gastric cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a large population-based cohort study and external validation.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Analysis of multiple factors influencing the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer.Aging · 2024Article
- Developing and validating a prognostic nomogram for ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients: A retrospective comparison of lymph node staging schemes with competing risk analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Prognostic Nomograms Based on Three Lymph Node Classification Systems for Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study and External Validation.Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Gastric cancer with situs inversus totalis: does it really create difficulties for surgeons?Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The TNM pN stage based on the number of metastatic lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Many studies have highlighted the phenomenon of stage migration and problems in comparing groups of patients with different numbers of total lymph nodes harvested within TNM staging. The current version of UICC/AJCC and JGCA TNM classifications postulates a minimal number of 16 lymph nodes as the base for N stage determination. Alternative systems such as lymph node ratio (LNR), positive to negative lymph node ratio (PNLNR), and LOGODDS (or LODDS), were implemented to increase the quality of LN assessment. These methods have reached the background in the literature, but to date no standard approach according to the cut-offs for the stages has been implemented. LOGODDS is the method that most reflects the number of harvested lymph nodes. The rationale for alternative staging methods, their correlations, and limitations are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.