Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27713270›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2010

Targeting the Tumour: Cell Penetrating Peptides for Molecular Imaging and Radiotherapy.

Veerle Kersemans, Bart Cornelissen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Cancer-Targeting Applications of Cell-Penetrating Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Molecular Imaging of p53 in Mouse Models of Cancer Using a Radiolabeled Antibody TAT Conjugate with SPECT.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Imaging the DNA damage response with PET and SPECT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Organelle targeting: third level of drug targeting.Drug design, development and therapy · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Veerle KersemansGray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford/Old Road Campus Research Building, Off Roosevelt Drive, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK. veerle.kersemans@rob.ox.ac.uk.
Bart CornelissenGray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford/Old Road Campus Research Building, Off Roosevelt Drive, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK. bart.cornelissen@rob.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last couple of years, the number of original papers and reviews discussing various applications of cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) has grown exponentially. This is not remarkable since CPPs are capable of transporting the most varying cargo across cell membranes which is one of the biggest problems in drug delivery and targeted therapy. In this review, we focus on the use of CPPs and related peptides for delivery of imaging contrast agents and radionuclides to cells and tissues with the ultimate goal of

Indexed as

cell penetrating peptidesmolecular imagingradioimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27713270
PMCPMC4033971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.