Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27712117›Full record

ReviewBrain injury2016

Clinical relevance of midline fluid percussion brain injury: Acute deficits, chronic morbidities and the utility of biomarkers.

Jonathan Lifshitz, Rachel K Rowe, Daniel R Griffiths, Megan N Evilsizor, Theresa C Thomas, P David Adelson, Tracy K McIntosh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain injury, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Amplified Gliosis and Interferon-Associated Inflammation in the Aging Brain following Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Inflammatory Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan Lifshitza Translational Neurotrauma Research Program , BARROW Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital , Phoenix , AZ , USA.
Rachel K Rowea Translational Neurotrauma Research Program , BARROW Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital , Phoenix , AZ , USA.
Daniel R Griffithsa Translational Neurotrauma Research Program , BARROW Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital , Phoenix , AZ , USA.
Megan N Evilsizora Translational Neurotrauma Research Program , BARROW Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital , Phoenix , AZ , USA.
Theresa C Thomasa Translational Neurotrauma Research Program , BARROW Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital , Phoenix , AZ , USA.
P David Adelsona Translational Neurotrauma Research Program , BARROW Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital , Phoenix , AZ , USA.
Tracy K McIntoshe Media NeuroConsultants, Inc ., Media , PA , USA.

Funding

Neural circuit disruption by diffuse brain injury: basis for morbidity & therapyR01NS065052 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LIFSHITZ, JONATHAN · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Post Traumatic Sleep: An Individualized Indicator of Severity and RecoveryR21NS072611 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LIFSHITZ, JONATHAN, O'HARA, BRUCE FREDERICK · 2011 to 2012
$408k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065052NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS072611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter 30 years of characterisation and implementation, fluid percussion injury (FPI) is firmly recognised as one of the best-characterised reproducible and clinically relevant models of TBI, encompassing concussion through diffuse axonal injury (DAI). Depending on the specific injury parameters (e.g. injury site, mechanical force), FPI can model diffuse TBI with or without a focal component and may be designated as mild-to-severe according to the chosen mechanical forces and resulting acute neurological responses. Among FPI models, midline FPI may best represent clinical diffuse TBI, because of the acute behavioural deficits, the transition to late-onset behavioural morbidities and the absence of gross histopathology. REVIEW: The goal here was to review acute and chronic physiological and behavioural deficits and morbidities associated with diffuse TBI induced by midline FPI. In the absence of neurodegenerative sequelae associated with focal injury, there is a need for biomarkers in the diagnostic, prognostic, predictive and therapeutic approaches to evaluate outcomes from TBI.

conclusionsThe current literature suggests that midline FPI offers a clinically-relevant, validated model of diffuse TBI to investigators wishing to evaluate novel therapeutic strategies in the treatment of TBI and the utility of biomarkers in the delivery of healthcare to patients with brain injury.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesDisease Models, AnimalPercussionAnimalsBehcet SyndromeBiomarkersHumansMorbidityBiomarkersbiomarkerbrain injurycentraldiffuseMidline

Identifiers

PMID27712117
PMCPMC5303557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.