Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27711918›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2016

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Comparative Effectiveness Trial for Diabetic Macular Edema: Additional Efficacy Post Hoc Analyses of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lee M Jampol, Adam R Glassman, Neil M Bressler, John A Wells, Allison R Ayala, Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01627249 (A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept, Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01627249 phase3completednot on this map

A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Intravitreal Aflibercept, Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema

TypeinterventionalSponsorJaeb Center for Health ResearchRan2012 to 2019Enrolled660ConditionsDiabetic Macular EdemaArms2.0 mg intravitreal aflibercept, 1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab, 0.3 mg intravitreal ranibizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. VEGFR1 signaling in retinal angiogenesis and microinflammation.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lee M JampolFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Adam R GlassmanJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Neil M BresslerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland4Editor, JAMA Ophthalmology.
John A WellsPalmetto Retina Center, West Columbia, South Carolina.
Allison R AyalaJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
Jaeb Center for Health Research · USJohns Hopkins University · USNorthwestern University · USPalmetto Retina Center · US

Funding

DIABETIC RETINOPATHY CLINICAL RESEARCH NETWORK COORDINATING CENTERU10EY014231 · NEI · JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · PI GLASSMAN, ADAM R · 2002 to 2018
$91.2M
DRCR Retina NetworkUG1EY014231 · NEI · JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · PI Adam R Glassman, DANIEL F MARTIN · 2019 to 2026
$75.4M
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Chair GrantU10EY023207 · NEI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI JAMPOL, LEE M · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Operations CenterU10EY018817 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BRESSLER, NEIL MICHAEL · 2009 to 2013
$769k
NEI NIH HHS U10 EY014231NEI NIH HHS U10 EY018817NEI NIH HHS U10 EY023207NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY014231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePost hoc analyses from the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network randomized clinical trial comparing aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME) might influence interpretation of study results.

objectiveTo provide additional outcomes comparing 3 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents for DME. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsPost hoc analyses performed from May 3, 2016, to June 21, 2016, of a randomized clinical trial performed from August 22, 2012, to September 23, 2015, of 660 participants comparing 3 anti-VEGF treatments in eyes with center-involved DME causing vision impairment. EXPOSURES: Randomization to intravitreous aflibercept (2.0 mg), bevacizumab (1.25 mg), or ranibizumab (0.3 mg) administered up to monthly based on a structured retreatment regimen. Focal/grid laser treatment was added after 6 months for the treatment of persistent DME. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in visual acuity (VA) area under the curve and change in central subfield thickness (CST) within subgroups based on whether an eye received laser treatment for DME during the study.

resultsPost hoc analyses were performed for 660 participants (mean [SD] age, 61 [10] years; 47% female, 65% white, 16% black or African American, 16% Hispanic, and 3% other). For eyes with an initial VA of 20/50 or worse, VA improvement was greater with aflibercept than the other agents at 1 year but superior only to bevacizumab at 2 years. Mean (SD) letter change in VA over 2 years (area under curve) was greater with aflibercept (+17.1 [9.7]) than with bevacizumab (+12.1 [9.4]; 95% CI, +1.6 to +7.3; P < .001) or ranibizumab (+13.6 [8.5]; 95% CI, +0.7 to +6.0; P = .009). When VA was 20/50 or worse at baseline, bevacizumab reduced CST less than the other agents at 1 year, but at 2 years the differences had diminished. In subgroups stratified by baseline VA, anti-VEGF agent, and whether focal/grid laser treatment was performed for DME, the only participants to have a substantial reduction in mean CST between 1 and 2 years were those with a baseline VA of 20/50 or worse receiving bevacizumab and laser treatment (mean [SD], -55 [108] µm; 95% CI, -82 to -28 µm; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although post hoc analyses should be viewed with caution given the potential for bias, in eyes with a VA of 20/50 or worse, aflibercept has the greatest improvement in VA over 2 years. Focal/grid laser treatment, ceiling and floor effects, or both may account for mean thickness reductions noted only in bevacizumab-treated eyes between 1 and 2 years.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01627249.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabDiabetic RetinopathyDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMacula LuteaMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID27711918
PMCPMC5567802
OpenAlexW2528599938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.