Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27711115›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Potency Biomarker Signature Genes from Multiparametric Osteogenesis Assays: Will cGMP Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Make Bone?

Alba Murgia, Elena Veronesi, Olivia Candini, Anna Caselli, Naomi D'souza, Valeria Rasini, Andrea Giorgini, Fabio Catani, Lorenzo Iughetti, Massimo Dominici and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Illustrative Potency Assay Examples from Approved Therapies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Advanced Technologies for Potency Assay Measurement.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Identifying Biomarkers for Osteogenic Potency Assay Development.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Collagen type XV and the 'osteogenic status'.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2017
    Article
  18. Effects ofBioscience reports · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alba MurgiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italia.
Elena VeronesiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italia.
Olivia CandiniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italia.
Anna CaselliCVBF - Consorzio per le Valutazioni Biologiche e Farmacologiche, Ospedale Pediatrico Giovanni XXIII, Bari, Italia.
Naomi D'souzaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italia.
Valeria RasiniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italia.
Andrea GiorginiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italia.
Fabio CataniDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italia.
Lorenzo IughettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italia.
Massimo DominiciDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italia.
Jorge S BurnsDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8602-1536
Science & Technology Park (Czechia) · CZUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITConsorzio per Valutazioni Biologiche e Farmacologiche · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In skeletal regeneration approaches using human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hBM-MSC), functional evaluation before implantation has traditionally used biomarkers identified using fetal bovine serum-based osteogenic induction media and time courses of at least two weeks. However, emerging pre-clinical evidence indicates donor-dependent discrepancies between these ex vivo measurements and the ability to form bone, calling for improved tests. Therefore, we adopted a multiparametric approach aiming to generate an osteogenic potency assay with improved correlation. hBM-MSC populations from six donors, each expanded under clinical-grade (cGMP) conditions, showed heterogeneity for ex vivo growth response, mineralization and bone-forming ability in a murine xenograft assay. A subset of literature-based biomarker genes was reproducibly upregulated to a significant extent across all populations as cells responded to two different osteogenic induction media. These 12 biomarkers were also measurable in a one-week assay, befitting clinical cell expansion time frames and cGMP growth conditions. They were selected for further challenge using a combinatorial approach aimed at determining ex vivo and in vivo consistency. We identified five globally relevant osteogenic signature genes, notably TGF-ß1 pathway interactors; ALPL, COL1A2, DCN, ELN and RUNX2. Used in agglomerative cluster analysis, they correctly grouped the bone-forming cell populations as distinct. Although donor #6 cells were correlation slope outliers, they contrastingly formed bone without showing ex vivo mineralization. Mathematical expression level normalization of the most discrepantly upregulated signature gene COL1A2, sufficed to cluster donor #6 with the bone-forming classification. Moreover, attenuating factors causing genuine COL1A2 gene down-regulation, restored ex vivo mineralization. This suggested that the signature gene had an osteogenically influential role; nonetheless no single biomarker was fully deterministic whereas all five signature genes together led to accurate cluster analysis. We show proof of principle for an osteogenic potency assay providing early characterization of primary cGMP-hBM-MSC cultures according to their donor-specific bone-forming potential.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCalcification, PhysiologicCluster AnalysisCollagen Type IDown-RegulationGenetic MarkersHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMiceOsteogenesisPhenotypeQuality ControlTranscriptional ActivationTransforming Growth Factor beta1BiomarkersCollagen Type IGenetic MarkersTransforming Growth Factor beta1

Identifiers

PMID27711115
PMCPMC5053614
OpenAlexW2529277346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.