ReviewPLoS genetics2016
Chromosomal Replication Complexity: A Novel DNA Metrics and Genome Instability Factor.
Review in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- UV induces codirectional replication-transcription conflicts and an alternative DnaA-dependent replication origin in the rnhAB mutants of Escherichiacoli.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Genome-wide mapping of spontaneous DNA replication error-hotspots using mismatch repair proteins in rapidly proliferating Escherichia coli.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Single-cell analysis reveals host S phase drives large T antigen expression during BK polyomavirus infection.PLoS pathogens · 2024Article
- Catastrophic chromosome fragmentation probes the nucleoid structure and dynamics in Escherichia coli.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Making Choices: DNA Replication Fork Recovery Mechanisms.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021Review
- Selective Inbreeding: Genetic Crosses Drive Apparent Adaptive Mutation in the Cairns-Foster System ofGenetics · 2020Article
- Characterization of repeat arrays in ultra-long nanopore reads reveals frequent origin of satellite DNA from retrotransposon-derived tandem repeats.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2020Article
- Too Much of a Good Thing: How Ectopic DNA Replication Affects Bacterial Replication Dynamics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- A new role for Escherichia coli Dam DNA methylase in prevention of aberrant chromosomal replication.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Thymineless Death inJournal of bacteriology · 2019Article
- Selection and Plasmid Transfer Underlie Adaptive Mutation inGenetics · 2018Article
- Chromosomal over-replication in Escherichia coli recG cells is triggered by replication fork fusion and amplified if replichore symmetry is disturbed.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Satellite DNA in Vicia faba is characterized by remarkable diversity in its sequence composition, association with centromeres, and replication timing.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Phenotypes ofJournal of bacteriology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As the ratio of the copy number of the most replicated to the unreplicated regions in the same chromosome, the definition of chromosomal replication complexity (CRC) appears to leave little room for variation, being either two during S-phase or one otherwise. However, bacteria dividing faster than they replicate their chromosome spike CRC to four and even eight. A recent experimental inquiry about the limits of CRC in Escherichia coli revealed two major reasons to avoid elevating it further: (i) increased chromosomal fragmentation and (ii) complications with subsequent double-strand break repair. Remarkably, examples of stable elevated CRC in eukaryotic chromosomes are well known under various terms like "differential replication," "underreplication," "DNA puffs," "onion-skin replication," or "re-replication" and highlight the phenomenon of static replication fork (sRF). To accurately describe the resulting "amplification by overinitiation," I propose a new term: "replification" (subchromosomal overreplication). In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, replification, via sRF processing, causes double-strand DNA breaks and, with their repair elevating chromosomal rearrangements, represents a novel genome instability factor. I suggest how static replication bubbles could be stabilized and speculate that some tandem duplications represent such persistent static bubbles. Moreover, I propose how static replication bubbles could be transformed into tandem duplications, double minutes, or inverted triplications. Possible experimental tests of these models are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.