Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27711112›Full record

ReviewPLoS genetics2016

Chromosomal Replication Complexity: A Novel DNA Metrics and Genome Instability Factor.

Andrei Kuzminov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Making Choices: DNA Replication Fork Recovery Mechanisms.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Thymineless Death inJournal of bacteriology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Phenotypes ofJournal of bacteriology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrei KuzminovDepartment of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Chromosomal death due to misincorporation of wrong material into DNAR01GM073115 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KUZMINOV, ANDREI · 2007 to 2022
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the ratio of the copy number of the most replicated to the unreplicated regions in the same chromosome, the definition of chromosomal replication complexity (CRC) appears to leave little room for variation, being either two during S-phase or one otherwise. However, bacteria dividing faster than they replicate their chromosome spike CRC to four and even eight. A recent experimental inquiry about the limits of CRC in Escherichia coli revealed two major reasons to avoid elevating it further: (i) increased chromosomal fragmentation and (ii) complications with subsequent double-strand break repair. Remarkably, examples of stable elevated CRC in eukaryotic chromosomes are well known under various terms like "differential replication," "underreplication," "DNA puffs," "onion-skin replication," or "re-replication" and highlight the phenomenon of static replication fork (sRF). To accurately describe the resulting "amplification by overinitiation," I propose a new term: "replification" (subchromosomal overreplication). In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, replification, via sRF processing, causes double-strand DNA breaks and, with their repair elevating chromosomal rearrangements, represents a novel genome instability factor. I suggest how static replication bubbles could be stabilized and speculate that some tandem duplications represent such persistent static bubbles. Moreover, I propose how static replication bubbles could be transformed into tandem duplications, double minutes, or inverted triplications. Possible experimental tests of these models are discussed.

Indexed as

Genomic InstabilityChromosomes, BacterialDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID27711112
PMCPMC5053440
OpenAlexW2528544242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.