Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27711110›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

Stoichiometric Representation of Gene-Protein-Reaction Associations Leverages Constraint-Based Analysis from Reaction to Gene-Level Phenotype Prediction.

Daniel Machado, Markus J Herrgård, Isabel Rocha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Obtaining PDC and other high-added value products from lignin byJournal of integrative bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Monitoring and modelling the glutamine metabolic pathway: a review and future perspectives.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Application of comparative genomics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel MachadoCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-5383
Markus J HerrgårdThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Horsølm, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2377-9929
Isabel RochaCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9494-3410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-scale metabolic reconstructions are currently available for hundreds of organisms. Constraint-based modeling enables the analysis of the phenotypic landscape of these organisms, predicting the response to genetic and environmental perturbations. However, since constraint-based models can only describe the metabolic phenotype at the reaction level, understanding the mechanistic link between genotype and phenotype is still hampered by the complexity of gene-protein-reaction associations. We implement a model transformation that enables constraint-based methods to be applied at the gene level by explicitly accounting for the individual fluxes of enzymes (and subunits) encoded by each gene. We show how this can be applied to different kinds of constraint-based analysis: flux distribution prediction, gene essentiality analysis, random flux sampling, elementary mode analysis, transcriptomics data integration, and rational strain design. In each case we demonstrate how this approach can lead to improved phenotype predictions and a deeper understanding of the genotype-to-phenotype link. In particular, we show that a large fraction of reaction-based designs obtained by current strain design methods are not actually feasible, and show how our approach allows using the same methods to obtain feasible gene-based designs. We also show, by extensive comparison with experimental 13C-flux data, how simple reformulations of different simulation methods with gene-wise objective functions result in improved prediction accuracy. The model transformation proposed in this work enables existing constraint-based methods to be used at the gene level without modification. This automatically leverages phenotype analysis from reaction to gene level, improving the biological insight that can be obtained from genome-scale models.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationGene Expression RegulationGenomeHumansMetabolic Flux AnalysisMetabolomePhenotypeProtein Interaction MappingProteomeProteome

Identifiers

PMID27711110
PMCPMC5053500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.