Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27711053›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2016

Modeling and correction of structural variations in patient-derived iPSCs using CRISPR/Cas9.

Chul-Yong Park, Jin Jea Sung, Sang-Hwi Choi, Dongjin R Lee, In-Hyun Park, Dong-Wook Kim

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Efficient correction ofMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Ready for Repair? Gene Editing Enters the Clinic for the Treatment of Human Disease.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020
    Review
  6. Chromosome Transplantation: A Possible Approach to Treat Human X-linked Disorders.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Targeted Reactivation ofFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. CRISPR Editing in Biological and Biomedical Investigation.Journal of cellular biochemistry · 2017
    Review
  14. Editing the genome of hiPSC with CRISPR/Cas9: disease models.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chul-Yong ParkDepartment of Physiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Jea SungDepartment of Physiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sang-Hwi ChoiDepartment of Physiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dongjin R LeeDepartment of Physiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
In-Hyun ParkDepartment of Genetics, Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Dong-Wook KimDepartment of Physiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei University · KRYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome engineering technology using engineered nucleases has been rapidly developing, enabling the efficient correction of simple mutations. However, the precise correction of structural variations (SVs) such as large inversions remains limited. Here we describe a detailed procedure for the modeling or correction of large chromosomal rearrangements and short nucleotide repeat expansions using engineered nucleases in human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) from a healthy donor and patients with SVs. This protocol includes the delivery of engineered nucleases with no donor template to hiPSCs, and genotyping and derivation/characterization of gene-manipulated hiPSC clones. With engineered nucleases, genomic inversions, reversions, and deletions of short nucleotide expansions can be identified in 2 weeks, and desired clones can be generated in as little as 3-4 weeks. This protocol enables the correction of large inverted segments and short nucleotide repeat expansions in diseases such as hemophilia A, fragile X syndrome, Hunter syndrome, and Friedreich's ataxia.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationModels, GeneticBase SequenceCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA End-Joining RepairGene RearrangementGenetic EngineeringGenome, HumanHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID27711053
OpenAlexW2528094826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.