Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27710994›Full record

ArticleMCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing

Development of Feeding Cues During Infancy and Toddlerhood.

Eric A Hodges, Heather M Wasser, Brook K Colgan, Margaret E Bentley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Study on Online Intervention for Early Childhood Eating Disorders during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Exploring Correlates of Infant Clarity of Cues During Early Feeding Interactions.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric A HodgesEric A. Hodges is an Associate Professor, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, N.C. The author can be reached via e-mail at eahodges@email.unc.eduHeather M. Wasser is a Research Assistant Professor, Center for Women's Health Research, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, N.C.Brook K. Colgan is Vice President and Director of Training for WISE (Women-Inspired Systems' Enrichment) in Chapel Hill, N.C.Margaret E. Bentley is a Professor, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, N.C.
Heather M Wasser
Brook K Colgan
Margaret E Bentley

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Infant Care, Feeding, and Risk of ObesityR01HD042219 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BENTLEY, MARGARET E · 2002 to 2008
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042219NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo enhance responsive feeding, this study aimed to characterize the development of feeding cues during infancy and toddlerhood. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsA secondary analysis was performed on a dataset of first-time, low-income African American mother-infant pairs assessed at infant age 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months. A subsample with the 15 highest, middle, and lowest infant body mass index (BMI) Z-scores at 18 months was selected (n = 45). Using video-recorded home feedings, early, active, and late receptiveness and fullness cues were assessed using the Responsiveness to Child Feeding Cues Scale at each time point. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize development.

resultsEarly receptiveness cues were relatively rare over time, whereas active receptiveness cues were much more common. However, there were changes over time. For example, settling into the feeding decreased from ~50% at 3 and 6 months to 4.8% by 18 months, whereas postural attention and reaching for food increased after 6 months. In the first 6 months, falling asleep and decreasing muscle tone and activity level were the most common early fullness cues. Thereafter, taking interest in surroundings was most prevalent. Active fullness cues became increasingly diverse after 6 months, led by more assertive cues such as pushing or pulling away and communicating "no" verbally or nonverbally. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These findings provide an empirical description of waxing and waning in feeding cues and indicate increasing intentionality of cues over the first 18 months of life. Knowing common cues across development may aid clinicians in enhancing parental feeding responsiveness, avoiding overfeeding, thereby decreasing risk of early childhood obesity.

Indexed as

CuesFeeding BehaviorMother-Child RelationsAdolescentAdultChild, PreschoolCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansInfant

Identifiers

PMID27710994
PMCPMC5057392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.