Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27709851›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2016

Comparison of Dosimetric Performance among Commercial Quality Assurance Systems for Verifying Pretreatment Plans of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Flattening-Filter-Free Beams.

Jin Beom Chung, Sang Won Kang, Keun Yong Eom, Changhoon Song, Kyoung Sik Choi, Tae Suk Suh

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sensitivity of the IQM and MatriXX detectors in megavolt photon beams.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jin Beom ChungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2668-3906
Sang Won KangResearch Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-7757
Keun Yong EomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3650-1133
Changhoon SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0714-8775
Kyoung Sik ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, SAM Anyang Hospital, Anyang, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6247-4314
Tae Suk SuhResearch Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3057-1627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different commercial quality assurance (QA) systems for the pretreatment verification plan of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique using a flattening-filter-free beam. The verification for 20 pretreatment cancer patients (seven lung, six spine, and seven prostate cancers) were tested using three QA systems (EBT3 film, I'mRT MatriXX array, and MapCHECK). All the SBRT-VMAT plans were optimized in the Eclipse (version 11.0.34) treatment planning system (TPS) using the Acuros XB dose calculation algorithm and were delivered to the Varian TrueBeam® accelerator equipped with a high-definition multileaf collimator. Gamma agreement evaluation was analyzed with the criteria of 2% dose difference and 2 mm distance to agreement (2%/2 mm) or 3%/3 mm. The highest passing rate (99.1% for 3%/3 mm) was observed on the MapCHECK system while the lowest passing rate was obtained on the film. The pretreatment verification results depend on the QA systems, treatment sites, and delivery beam energies. However, the delivery QA results for all QA systems based on the TPS calculation showed a good agreement of more than 90% for both the criteria. It is concluded that the three 2D QA systems have sufficient potential for pretreatment verification of the SBRT-VMAT plan.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareRadiosurgeryAlgorithmsBone NeoplasmsHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesDelivery Quality AssurancePretreatment VerificationStereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27709851
PMCPMC5056205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.